TO: | Honorable Kent Grusendorf, Chair, House Committee on Public Education |
FROM: | John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB606 by Mowery (Relating to a state allotment to school districts for teacher salaries.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2004 | $909,000,000 |
2005 | $600,411,000 |
2006 | $214,259,000 |
2007 | ($137,141,000) |
2008 | ($33,897,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFOUNDATION SCHOOL FUND 193 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGENERAL REVENUE FUND 1 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCounties | Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCities |
---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | $909,000,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
2005 | $595,000,000 | $5,411,000 | ($38,047,000) | ($88,404,000) |
2006 | $200,000,000 | $14,259,000 | ($79,899,000) | ($185,648,000) |
2007 | ($163,000,000) | $25,859,000 | ($125,841,000) | ($292,396,000) |
2008 | ($78,000,000) | $44,103,000 | ($176,178,000) | ($409,355,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromSchool Districts |
---|---|
2004 | $0 |
2005 | ($182,403,000) |
2006 | ($383,047,000) |
2007 | ($603,298,000) |
2008 | ($844,618,000) |
The Texas Education Agency estimated the impact of the new state aid program using a projection of
students for the next biennium and beyond. The agency estimates a reduction in state aid and savings to the state, that would result from the teacher salary allotment replacing the current law formulas, to be $2 billion in fiscal year 2004, the first year the bill would be in effect. By fiscal year 2008, the reduction in state aid is expected to be about $1.4 billion. This savings would be lowered by the elimination of recapture revenue to the state, since the bill would abolish the requirement that property wealthy school districts reduce their wealth per student. TEA estimates the
state would lose about $1.1 billion in receipts in fiscal year 2004, increasing to about $1.5 billion
by fiscal year 2008.
The elimination of the Property Value Study would result in a loss to all taxing entities. State total taxable values would drop by an estimated 1 percent per year below their future amounts under current law because of the proposed abolition of the property value study. Estimated city, county, and school district tax rates were applied to the 1 percent per year taxable value loss to estimate levy losses. Special districts would also incur a cost, but information is not available to estimate the amount. A trend factor of 5 percent was used to account for increases in value, tax rates, and new property. School district losses would no longer be reimbursed by the state in the following year.
The estimated fiscal implications to general revenue reflect estimated dynamic tax feedback effects created by the increase/decrease in industry and/or individuals' tax burdens. The dynamic tax feedback effects are shown in the fiscal impact table only with respect to the gain/loss incurred by the General Revenue Fund 0001. The table reflects only the fiscal impact related to the elimination of the Property Value Study is Chapter 403 of the Government Code.
Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 701 Central Education Agency
|
LBB Staff: | JK, CT, WP, RN
|