LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 78TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 11, 2003

TO:
Honorable David Swinford, Chair, House Committee on Government Reform
 
FROM:
John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1318 by Swinford (Relating to workforce planning requirements for state agencies and the compensation, accountability, and employment of certain state employees.), As Introduced



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1318, As Introduced: a positive impact of $16,925,750 through the biennium ending August 31, 2005.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2004 $6,965,250
2005 $9,960,500
2006 $12,778,500
2007 $15,121,000
2008 $15,121,000




Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
GENERAL REVENUE FUND
1
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
GR DEDICATED ACCOUNTS
994
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
FEDERAL FUNDS
555
2004 $6,965,250 $2,278,250 $3,808,500
2005 $9,960,500 $3,126,000 $5,559,750
2006 $12,778,500 $3,192,250 $5,784,500
2007 $15,121,000 $4,974,000 $9,011,250
2008 $15,121,000 $4,974,000 $9,011,250

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would allow agencies to make payments of up to $5,000 under certain circumstances when hiring new employees or to retain current employees. Because the language is permissive, agencies would not require additional funds to make use of the provision.

The bill would impose new training requirements on agencies for their managerial staff. Three agencies reported additional administrative costs for this provision.

The bill would impose limitations on the allowable management to staff ratio at state agencies, equal to 1:8 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004, 1:9 in FY 2005, 1:10 in FY 2006 and 1:11 afterwards. The current average ratio is approximately 1:13, but some agencies are below 1:8 and would have to reduce management staff to meet this requirement, others would have to reduce management staff to meet the other ratios. 


Methodology

Managers generally do not spend all of their time managing. Employees will have to do the work that the former managers used to do and someone will have to do the managing. The managers who are left will do less work since they are managing more. Employees capable of performing similar work could be paid somewhat less since they are not managers, perhaps as much as 20% less. So it is assumed that 20% of the managers' salaries could be saved by the agency without affecting the overall quantity of work performed. Manager salaries are estimated to be 25% greater than median salaries at the agencies. Estimates of management FTE reductions required are made for agencies which exceed the targeted ratio for each of the ratio targets. Savings in a given year would be the management FTE reductions at an agency times the average manager salaries at the agency times 20 percent. Reductions in employee benefits are included.

Savings are estimated from 2003 appropriated levels and may not be fully realized under the initial General Revenue amounts currently under consideration by the Legislature.


Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller Of Public Accounts, 308 State Auditor's Office, 320 Texas Workforce Commission, 362 Texas Lottery Commission, 405 Department Of Public Safety, 501 Department Of Health, 582 Commission On Environmental Quality, 601 Department Of Transportation, 655 Department Of Mental Health And Mental Retardation, 696 Department Of Criminal Justice
LBB Staff:
JK, JO, GO, WM, MS