LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 78TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 24, 2003

TO:
Honorable Glenn Lewis, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
 
FROM:
John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1816 by McReynolds (Relating to the counties eligible to create a county assistance district that may impose a sales and use tax.), As Introduced

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would change the requirements for eligibility for a county to create a county assistance district that may impose a sales and use tax. The bill would take effect immediately if it receives a two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2003.

Under existing statute, only a county with a population of less than 45,000 and in which a Transportation Code, Chapter 451 or Chapter 452 transit authority is included in any portion of the territory is eligible to create a county assistance district. The provisions of the bill would add that a county with a population of less than 45,000 that does not impose a sales and use tax under Chapter 323, Tax Code, would also be eligible to establish a county assistance district. Regardless of the eligibility requirement that applies to a county, the combined local tax rate in such a district could not exceed 2 percent.

Currently, there are four transit authorities established under Chapter 451 of the Transportation Code and two established under Chapter 452. None of those six authorities is in a county with a population under 45,000. There are 101 counties that would fit the eligibility criteria for creating a county assistance district under the proposed amended statute.

A county choosing to create a county assistance district would incur the cost of holding an election to decide whether to create a district and to vote on the tax rate to be imposed.

The Comptroller of Public Accounts estimates incurring administrative costs of $134,470 in fiscal year 2004 to notify taxpayers and $460 per year through fiscal year 2008 for technology costs to respond to additional telephone calls regarding the impact of the creation of new county assistance districts.


Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
JK, DLBa