TO: | Honorable Rick Hardcastle, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock |
FROM: | John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB1982 by Puente (Relating to the sale of cacti; providing a penalty.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2004 | $0 |
2005 | $0 |
2006 | $0 |
2007 | $0 |
2008 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGENERAL REVENUE FUND 1 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGENERAL REVENUE FUND 1 |
---|---|---|
2004 | ($134,150) | $134,150 |
2005 | ($134,150) | $134,150 |
2006 | ($134,150) | $134,150 |
2007 | ($134,150) | $134,150 |
2008 | ($134,150) | $134,150 |
TDA estimates that 100 locations that grow cacti that would need to be inspected on a monthly basis at a minimum, to meet the requirements of the bill. This would result in an additional 1,200 inspections annually for TDA inspectors. Using the average cost of $79 for a nursery and floral inspection, these additional inspections would cost $94,800 annually plus 28.46% indirect cost ($26,980) for a total of $121,780. It is also estimated that TDA would receive 30 complaints annually, which would inquire inspections resulting in an additional cost of $2,370 annually.
It is estimated that TDA inspectors would be required to mark 100,000 cacti during their inspections. The cost of the tags used to mark these plants would be $10,000 (100,000 * $.10 = $10,000).
The total cost of implementing this bill would be $134,150 annually. In order to recoup these costs the agency anticipates charging a fee of $109 per inspection.
TDA anticipates the possible revenue generated from penalties for selling or advertising cacti not to be significant.
Source Agencies: | 551 Department of Agriculture
|
LBB Staff: | JK, CL, JF
|