| TO: | Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Insurance |
| FROM: | John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
| IN RE: | HB3550 by Delisi (Relating to the definition of gross premiums for certain health insurance providers.), As Introduced |
| Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
|---|---|
| 2004 | $25,123,000 |
| 2005 | $25,983,000 |
| 2006 | $26,872,000 |
| 2007 | $27,791,000 |
| 2008 | $28,741,000 |
| Fiscal Year | Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromGENERAL REVENUE FUND 1 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromFOUNDATION SCHOOL FUND 193 |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | $18,842,000 | $6,281,000 |
| 2005 | $19,487,000 | $6,496,000 |
| 2006 | $20,154,000 | $6,718,000 |
| 2007 | $20,843,000 | $6,948,000 |
| 2008 | $21,556,000 | $7,185,000 |
The bill would include as gross premiums subject to tax those premiums received from the State of Texas for insurance contracted for by the state or federal government for the purpose of providing welfare benefits to designated welfare recipients.
The bill would repeal Insurance Code Article 27.05 relating to the premium tax exemption for Children's Health Benefit Plan premiums and revenues.
This bill would take effect immediately upon enactment, assuming that it received the requisite two-thirds majority votes in both houses of the Legislature. Otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2003.
According to the Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA), the potential tax base was estimated by first compiling projected managed care recipient-months and monthly premium rates for relevant Medicaid strategies from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission's (HHSC) Legislative Appropriations Request and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) strategy in HB 1. Based on information from HHSC, it was assumed that approximately two-thirds of managed care recipients and premium payments were to (taxable) HMOs and one-third were to (exempt) preferred provider organizations. To estimate the ensuing premium tax revenues, the resulting total premium volume was multiplied by the 1.75 percent tax rate and then adjusted for the half-rate that is applicable to the first $450,000 of an HMO's revenues. For the insurance maintenance tax there would be no net effect as any increase in the tax base would trigger a corresponding decrease in the tax rate so as to generate the same amount of revenue to meet Texas Department of Insurance's (TDI) regulatory costs. Because the bill does not provide that the insurance tax be included as an allowable cost for reimbursement under the state Medicaid and CHIP programs, this estimate does not include federal matching gains drawn with additional available state funds.
Potentially, the new expense to be incurred by CHIP and Medicaid providers could be claimed as a reimbursable expense through the CHIP and Medicaid programs and thus result in an increased cost to the state. However, HHSC indicates that such expenses would not be eligible for reimbursement under current rules. If rules were amended to allow for reimbursement of these expenses, the state share would be approximately 40 percent of Medicaid expenses and approximately 28 percent of CHIP expenses.
The bill would have a small cost to the CPA. It is assumed that the agency could absorb this cost within current resources.
| Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 454 Department of Insurance, 529 Health and Human Services Commission
|
| LBB Staff: | JK, WP, JRO, RT, RB
|