TO: | Honorable Tom Craddick, Speaker of the House, House of Representatives |
FROM: | John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HJR16 by Brown, Fred (Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize a county, a city or town, or a junior college district to establish an ad valorem tax freeze on residence homesteads of the disabled and of the elderly and their spouses.), As Passed 2nd House |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2004 | ($85,275) |
2005 | $0 |
2006 | $0 |
2007 | $0 |
2008 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable (Cost) from GENERAL REVENUE FUND 1 |
Probable Revenue (Loss) from Cities |
Probable Revenue (Loss) from Counties |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | ($85,275) | $0 | $0 |
2005 | $0 | ($10,835,000) | ($6,209,000) |
2006 | $0 | ($11,486,000) | ($6,582,000) |
2007 | $0 | ($12,175,000) | ($6,977,000) |
2008 | $0 | ($12,905,000) | ($7,396,000) |
The resolution would propose an amendment to authorize counties, cities, and towns, and junior college districts to adopt a property tax limitation for persons qualified for the 65-and-over residence homestead exemption and for disabled individuals. The limitation could be adopted by a commissioner's court or a city council or through an election triggered by petition of at least five percent of the registered voters in a county or city. Once adopted, a city or county could not repeal or rescind the limitation.
The proposed amendment would be submitted to voters at an election to be held September 13, 2003.
It is assumed that all cities, counties and junior college districts would adopt the proposed limitation in the 2004 tax year following adoption of the proposed amendment.
Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
|
LBB Staff: | JK, SD, CT, WP, DLBe
|