LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TAX CHANGES
 
78TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 29, 2003

TO:
Honorable Ron Wilson, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
 
FROM:
John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB53 by Wolens (Relating to an increase in the cigarette tax and the distribution of that increase to counties and municipalities for police, sheriff, and fire services.), As Introduced

THE FOLLOWING NEW INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS


The following new information was supplied by agency 304 COMPTROLLER OF PUB ACCTS:

Dynamic Fiscal Note Analysis

Comptroller of Public Accounts

 

For: HB 53 by Wolens

Date: February 6, 2003

 

 

I. Revenue Impact Analysis, 2004-2008

 

Fiscal

Year

Gain/(Loss) in Tax Revenue

General Revenue

Dynamic Feedback Revenue Effect

Net Gain/(Loss) to Tax Collections

2004

$384,065,000

($6,387,000)

$377,678,000

2005

520,850,000

(9,841,000)

511,009,000

2006

458,136,000

(10,005,000)

448,131,000

2007

491,656,000

(14,729,000)

476,927,000

2008

430,280,000

(18,235,000)

412,045,000

 

 

II. Economic Impact Analysis, 2004-2008

 

 

Fiscal

Year

Increase/

(Decrease) in Texas Personal Income

Increase/

(Decrease) in Texas Investment

Increase/

(Decrease) in Texas Employment

2004

($229,300,000)

($233,672,000)

(5,900)

2005

(285,500,000)

(267,638,000)

(7,800)

2006

(252,600,000)

(190,658,000)

(6,800)

2007

(294,100,000)

(193,879,000)

(7,200)

2008

(270,000,000)

(129,854,000)

(6,300)

 

Note: The values in Section II relate to changes in macroeconomic variables relative to the Comptroller's baseline economic forecast for each individual year.

III. Economic Implications after 2008

After ten years, by 2013, this bill could be expected to have decreased employment by 66,100 workers, investment by $1,487.6 million, and Texas Personal Income by $2,924.0 million.

IV. Methodology

A Texas-specific general equilibrium model was employed in calculating the economic impacts. The model distributes the value that otherwise would have been paid/saved in taxes by businesses and/or consumers among the state's economic sectors. The revenue feedback calculation is based on the historical relationships between state tax revenues and associated economic factors.



Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
JK, SJS