LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT
 
78TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 24, 2003

TO:
Honorable Talmadge Heflin, Chair, House Committee on Appropriations
 
FROM:
John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB459 by Gallego (Relating to annual vacation leave accrual for state employees.), As Introduced



EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Current

Proposed

Difference

State Contribution

Employee Contribution

Total Contribution

6 %

6 %

12 %

6 %

6 %

12 %

0

0

0

Normal Cost (% of payroll)

12.709 %

12.709 %

0.0%

Net Asset Balance (millions)

$459.6

$459.6

$0.0

Funded Ratio

102.5%

102.5%

0.0%

Amortization Period (years) as of 8/31/02 actuarial valuation

0.0

0.0

0.0

A Glossary of Actuarial Terms is provided at the end of this impact statement.

ACTUARIAL EFFECTS:

The actuary for the Employees' Retirement System (ERS) finds that the effect of HB459 would not have a material effect on the actuarial soundness of ERS or the Law Enforcement and Custodial Officers' Supplemental Retirement System (LECOSRF), based upon the benefit provisions, data, actuarial assumptions and actuarial funding methods.

SYNOPSIS OF PROVISIONS:

This bill, to be effective September 1, 2003, would provide the following changes:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

HB459 would increase the amount of vacation leave that an employee can accrue and accumulate by a relatively small amount. Currently, the actuarial valuations of ERS and LECOSRF assume that the total accumulated unused sick leave and annual leave of employee class members will increase credited service at retirement by 2.3%. The ERS actuary's conclusions are based upon the assumption that the changes proposed in HB459 would not materially increase the amount of additional service attributable to unused accumulated leave at retirement. The analysis considers only those changes contained in the proposal and cautions that the combined economic impact of several proposals currently under consideration could exceed the economic impact of each such proposal considered individually.

 

METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS:

The analysis relies on the participant data, financial information, benefit structure and actuarial assumptions and methods used in the August 31, 2002 actuarial valuations of ERS and LECOSRF. All actuarial projections have a degree of uncertainty because they are based on the probability of occurrence of future contingent events. Accordingly, actual results will be different from the results contained in the analysis to the extent actual future experience varies from the experience implied by the assumptions.

SOURCES:

Actuarial Analysis by Steven R. Rusher, Actuary, Towers Perrin, February 27, 2003

GLOSSARY OF ACTUARIAL TERMS:

Normal Cost-- the current cost as a percentage of payroll that is necessary to pre-fund pension benefits adequately during the course of an employee's career.

Unfunded Liability-- the amount of total liabilities that are not covered by the total assets of a retirement system. Both liabilities and assets are measured on an actuarial basis using certain assumptions including average annual salary increases, the investment return of the retirement fund, and the demographics of retirement system members.

Amortization Period-- the number of years required to pay-off the unfunded liability. Public retirement systems have found that amortization periods ranging from 20 to 40 years are acceptable. State law prohibits changes in TRS, ERS, or JRS-2 benefits or state contribution rates if the result is an amortization period exceeding 30.9 years.



Source Agencies:
338 Pension Review Board
LBB Staff:
JK, WM