LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT
 
78TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 20, 2003

TO:
Honorable Allan Ritter, Chair, House Committee on Pensions & Investments
 
FROM:
John Keel, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1442 by Barrientos (Relating to participation in, contributions to, and benefits and administration of retirement systems for police officers in certain municipalities.), As Engrossed





AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Current

Proposed

Difference

City Contribution

Employee Contribution

Total Contribution

9.00 %

18.00 %

27.00 %

9.00 %

18.00 %

27.00 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Normal Cost (%of payroll)

20.10 %

20.10 %

0.0 %

Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (millions)

$ 62.8

$ 62.8

$0.0

Amortization Period (years) as of 12/31/2001

18.8

18.8

0.0

A Glossary of Actuarial Terms is provided at the end of this impact statement.

ACTUARIAL EFFECTS:

The changes provided by SB1442 are generally expected to have no immediate actuarial effect or to be actuarially cost neutral. SB1442 authorizes the Austin Police Retirement System (APRS) Board of Trustees to change some benefit obligations, which could be significant. Under current law, such changes would require legislative approval.

SYNOPSIS OF PROVISIONS:

SB1442, to be effective September 1, 2003, would provide the following changes:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Under the provisions of SB1442, the APRS Board of Trustees is given the authority to change the APRS benefit obligations, in other words the authority to expand the RETRO DROP feature. Such changes to the benefits structure of APRS could be significant. Under current law, such changes would require legislative approval. This change would permit the APRS Board by rule adoption to modify or eliminate the RETRO DROP option only if the change or modification meets the following conditions:

  1. Approved by the Board's actuary
  2. Would not cause the retirement system's amortization period of the unfunded actuarial liability to exceed the maximum adopted by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

The APRS actuary certifies that provisions authorizing changes to the benefit obligations would have no immediate effect on the actuarial condition of APRS since any change would require future action by the APRS Board of Trustees.

Anti-selection would be likely to occur in the provision which allows purchase of service credit by paying the actuarial present value of the service credit, especially if the cost were far below the purchase cost of an equivalent annuity from the private sector. This could add to the long-term costs of the plan.

METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS:

The analysis relies on the participant data, financial information, benefit structure and actuarial assumptions and methods used in the December 31, 2001 actuarial valuation of APRS. According to the PRB actuary, the actuarial assumptions and methods appear to be reasonable. All actuarial projections have a degree of uncertainty because they are based on the probability of occurrence of future contingent events. Accordingly, actual results will be different from the results contained in the analysis to the extent actual future experience varies from the experience implied by the assumptions. Finally, the analysis assumes no further changes are made to APRS and cautions that the combined effect of several changes can exceed the effect of each change considered individually.

SOURCES:

GLOSSARY OF ACTUARIAL TERMS:

Normal Cost-- the current cost as a percentage of payroll that is necessary to pre-fund pension benefits adequately during the course of an employee's career.

Unfunded Liability-- the amount of total liabilities that are not covered by the total assets of a retirement system. Both liabilities and assets are measured on an actuarial basis using certain assumptions including average annual salary increases, the investment return of the retirement fund, and the demographics of retirement system members.

Amortization Period-- the number of years required to pay-off the unfunded liability. Public retirement systems have found that amortization periods ranging from 20 to 40 years are acceptable. State law prohibits changes in TRS, ERS, or JRS-2 benefits or state contribution rates if the result is an amortization period exceeding 30.9 years.



Source Agencies:
338 Pension Review Board
LBB Staff:
JK, WM