LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TAX CHANGES
 
79TH LEGISLATURE 1st CALLED SESSION - 2005
 
June 22, 2005

TO:
Honorable Jim Keffer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Deputy Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB3 by Keffer, Jim (Relating to property tax relief and protection of taxpayers, taxes and fees, and other matters relating to the financing of public schools; providing civil and criminal penalties.), As Introduced

THE FOLLOWING NEW INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS



The following new information was supplied by agency 304 COMPTROLLER OF PUB ACCTS:

Dynamic Fiscal Note Analysis

Comptroller of Public Accounts

 

For: HB 3 by Keffer, J

Date: June 22, 2005

 

I. Revenue Impact Analysis, 2006-2010

This assumes an effective date of September 1, 2005

 

Fiscal

Year

Gain/(Loss) in

General Revenue-Related

Funds

General Revenue

Dynamic Feedback Revenue Effect

Net Gain/(Loss) to

General Revenue-Related Funds

2006

$3,833,703,000

$20,739,000

$3,854,442,000

2007

4,682,077,000

56,066,000

4,738,143,000

2008

4,843,872,000

80,391,000

4,924,263,000

2009

5,088,937,000

115,572,000

5,204,509,000

2010

5,237,531,000

157,895,000

5,395,426,000

 

II. Economic Impact Analysis, 2006-2010

This assumes an effective date of September 1, 2005

Fiscal

Year

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Personal Income

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Investment

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Employment

2006

$715,100,000

$1,482,710,000

19,000

2007

1,525,000,000

2,715,502,000

37,000

2008

2,101,000,000

3,579,408,000

46,000

2009

2,568,000,000

4,166,279,000

52,000

2010

2,876,000,000

4,553,263,000

55,000

 

III. Economic Implications after Ten Years in 2015

Personal Income

$3,515,000,000

Investment

5,515,107,000

Employment

52,000

 

IV. Methodology

A Texas-specific general equilibrium model was used to distribute the savings/losses that would otherwise have been experienced by businesses and consumers among the state's economic sectors. The revenue feedback was based on the historical relationship between state tax revenues and associated economic factors.

The dynamic analysis assumes no enrichment and that the bill will recieve a 2/3 vote.



Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
JOB, SD, SJS