LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TAX CHANGES
 
79TH LEGISLATURE 1st CALLED SESSION - 2005
 
July 9, 2005

TO:
Honorable Steve Ogden, Chair, Senate Committee on Finance
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Deputy Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB3 by Keffer, Jim (Relating to financing public schools in this state and reducing property taxes.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

THE FOLLOWING NEW INFORMATION IS PROVIDED BY COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS



The following new information was supplied by agency 304 COMPTROLLER OF PUB ACCTS:

Comptroller of Public Accounts

Dynamic Fiscal Note Analysis

 

For: CSSB 3 2nd House Committe Sub by Ogden

Date: July 9, 2005

 

I. Revenue Impact Analysis, 2006-2010

 

Fiscal

Year

Gain/(Loss) in

Tax Revenue

General Revenue

Dynamic Feedback Revenue Effect

Net Gain/(Loss) to

Tax Collections

2006

$2,002,291,000

$13,211,000

$2,015,502,000

2007

4,191,289,000

58,305,000

4,249,594,000

2008

4,629,946,000

98,284,000

4,728,230,000

2009

4,902,056,000

126,154,000

5,028,210,000

2010

5,024,453,000

168,262,000

5,192,715,000

 

 

 

II. Economic Impact Analysis, 2006-2010

 

Fiscal

Year

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Personal Income

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Investment

Increase/(Decrease) in Texas Employment

2006

$449,000,000

$531,856,000

12,000

2007

1,677,000,000

2,243,546,000

42,000

2008

2,427,000,000

3,381,725,000

55,000

2009

2,912,000,000

4,089,100,000

60,000

2010

3,306,000,000

4,547,560,000

62,000

 

III. Economic Implications after Ten Years in 2015

Personal Income

$4,026,000,000

Investment

$5,463,795,000

Employment

60,000

 

IV. Methodology

A Texas-specific general equilibrium model was used in calculating the dynamic effects. The model distributes the savings/losses that would otherwise have been experienced by businesses and consumers among the state's economic sectors. The revenue feedback calculation was based on the historical relationship between state tax revenues and associated economic factors.

This analysis was assembled at the request of the Legislative Budget Board and should not be considered as a proposal recommended by Comptroller Strayhorn.



Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
JOB, SJS