TO: | Honorable Steve Ogden, Chair, Senate Committee on Finance |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Deputy Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB3 by Keffer, Jim (Relating to certain taxes affecting businesses; making an appropriation; providing penalties.), As Engrossed |
This analysis is for taxes effective in fiscal 2008.
House Bill 3, As Engrossed, was analyzed using the LBB’s multi-tax model to determine the initial impact of the proposed changes relative to current state and local tax law. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 2 below.
|
|
Current Law Liability |
Percent of Total |
Proposed Law Liability |
Percent of Total |
Change in Liability |
Percent of Total |
Percent Change in Liability |
[%] |
[$ Million] |
[%] |
[$ Million] |
[%] |
[$ Million] |
[%] |
[%] | |
___Taxes Paid by Business: | ||||||||
Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing |
0.8 |
774.6 |
2.1 |
872.9 |
2.1 |
98.3 |
2.9 |
12.69 |
Mining |
6.7 |
4,821.1 |
12.8 |
4,799.0 |
11.7 |
-22.1 |
-0.7 |
-0.46 |
Utilities & Transportation |
7.3 |
4,613.8 |
12.2 |
4,878.8 |
11.9 |
265.0 |
7.8 |
5.74 |
Construction |
5.1 |
1,188.4 |
3.1 |
1,379.7 |
3.4 |
191.3 |
5.6 |
16.10 |
Manufacturing |
13.0 |
5,212.4 |
13.8 |
6,128.6 |
14.9 |
916.2 |
27.1 |
17.58 |
Wholesale & Retail Trade |
15.8 |
3,279.8 |
8.7 |
3,416.1 |
8.3 |
136.3 |
4.0 |
4.16 |
Information |
5.1 |
3,103.9 |
8.2 |
3,611.9 |
8.8 |
508.0 |
15.0 |
16.37 |
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
19.7 |
8,695.7 |
23.0 |
8,855.8 |
21.5 |
160.1 |
4.7 |
1.84 |
All Other Services |
26.5 |
6,069.2 |
16.1 |
7,202.8 |
17.5 |
1,133.6 |
33.5 |
18.68 |
Total Taxes on Business: |
100.0 |
37,758.9 |
100.0 |
41,145.6 |
100.0 |
3,386.7 |
100.0 |
8.97 |
___Taxes Paid by Households: | ||||||||
Residential Owner-Occupied |
|
18,814.1 |
|
18,814.1 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.00 |
Personal Consumption |
|
18,872.3 |
|
18,872.3 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.00 |
Total Taxes on Households: |
|
37,686.4 |
|
37,686.4 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.00 |
| ||||||||
___Total Taxes |
|
75,445.3 |
|
78,832.0 |
|
3,386.7 |
|
4.49 |
Economists commonly distinguish between the initial "impact" of a tax and its "incidence." The initial impact of a tax falls on taxpayers legally liable to pay the tax, while the incidence refers to the ultimate payer of the tax. For example, the initial impact of a business tax falls on the firm incurring the tax liability. Over time, to varying degrees, the tax cost is "shifted" so that the ultimate burden of the tax falls either to consumers in different retail prices, to employees in changed wages, to owners of land and capital in different investment returns, or most likely, to some combination of all three. The degree to which a tax can be shifted, and the amount of time that elapses before a tax can be shifted, depend on the type of tax and the competitiveness of capital, labor, input material and product markets.
The results of this analysis for tax law changes effective with this proposal are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
Decile |
Decile Income: Lower Bound |
Decile Income: Upper Bound |
Current Law Tax |
Percent of Total |
Proposed Law Tax |
Percent of Total |
Change in Tax |
Percent Change in Tax |
[$] |
[$] |
[$ Million] |
[%] |
[$ Million] |
[%] |
[$ Million] |
[%] | |
1 |
0 |
14,042 |
2,153.2 |
3.6 |
2,221.1 |
3.6 |
67.8 |
3.15 |
2 |
14,042 |
23,872 |
2,485.7 |
4.2 |
2,580.0 |
4.2 |
94.3 |
3.79 |
3 |
23,872 |
33,190 |
3,217.2 |
5.4 |
3,337.7 |
5.4 |
120.5 |
3.75 |
4 |
33,190 |
43,403 |
3,552.4 |
6.0 |
3,682.7 |
6.0 |
130.3 |
3.67 |
5 |
43,403 |
53,968 |
4,375.6 |
7.4 |
4,544.2 |
7.4 |
168.6 |
3.85 |
6 |
53,968 |
67,019 |
5,112.2 |
8.6 |
5,301.5 |
8.6 |
189.3 |
3.70 |
7 |
67,019 |
82,976 |
6,151.9 |
10.4 |
6,392.7 |
10.4 |
240.8 |
3.91 |
8 |
82,976 |
104,865 |
7,470.7 |
12.6 |
7,759.6 |
12.6 |
288.9 |
3.87 |
9 |
104,865 |
146,804 |
9,292.5 |
15.7 |
9,650.5 |
15.7 |
358.0 |
3.85 |
10 |
146,804 |
and above |
15,336.0 |
25.9 |
15,987.9 |
26.0 |
651.9 |
4.25 |
|
|
Total: |
59,147.3 |
100.0 |
61,457.8 |
100.0 |
2,310.4 |
3.91 |
House Bill 3, As Engrossed, would ultimately increase the taxes of all households by $2,310.4 million for tax law changes effective in 2008. The difference between the initial increase in revenue of $3,386.7 million in fiscal 2008 and the ultimate increase of $2,310.4 million in tax incidence is primarily due to the exporting of some of the tax changes to non-Texas consumers and businesses, changes in federal tax liability, and the absorption of some of the tax changes by business profits, some of which are received by non-Texas shareholders and business owners.
Decile |
Decile Income: Lower Bound |
Decile Income: Upper Bound |
Current Law Effective Rate |
Proposed Law Effective Rate |
Change in Effective Rate |
Percent Change in Effective Rate |
[$] |
[$] |
[%] |
[%] |
[%] |
[%] | |
1 |
0 |
14,042 |
32.76 |
33.79 |
1.03 |
3.15 |
2 |
14,042 |
23,872 |
15.40 |
15.99 |
0.58 |
3.79 |
3 |
23,872 |
33,190 |
13.01 |
13.50 |
0.49 |
3.75 |
4 |
33,190 |
43,403 |
11.14 |
11.55 |
0.41 |
3.67 |
5 |
43,403 |
53,968 |
10.07 |
10.45 |
0.39 |
3.85 |
6 |
53,968 |
67,019 |
9.76 |
10.12 |
0.36 |
3.70 |
7 |
67,019 |
82,976 |
9.49 |
9.86 |
0.37 |
3.91 |
8 |
82,976 |
104,865 |
9.24 |
9.60 |
0.36 |
3.87 |
9 |
104,865 |
146,804 |
8.71 |
9.04 |
0.34 |
3.85 |
10 |
146,804 |
and above |
6.87 |
7.16 |
0.29 |
4.25 |
|
|
Total: |
9.09 |
9.44 |
0.36 |
3.91 |
House Bill 3, As Engrossed, would ultimately increase the effective rate for all households by 3.91 percent for taxes effective in fiscal year 2008 . The effective tax rate is the aggregate amount of tax in a given income class divided by the aggregate amount of personal income in that class.
Source Agencies: |
LBB Staff: | JOB, SD, SM
|