This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

Senate Research Center                                                                                                       H.B. 628

79R5927 HLT-F                                                                                                 By: Giddings (Ellis)

                                                                                                                        Business & Commerce

                                                                                                                                            5/14/2005

                                                                                                                                           Engrossed

 

 

AUTHOR'S/SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT

 

Currently, Texas law allows debt collection agencies to repeatedly contact a person in whose name a debt has been incurred.  However, the law does not appropriately address the situation of a debt that was created in the course of identity theft.  Thus, debt-collectors may vigorously pursue a person – who has been a victim of identity theft – for a debt that that person never actually owed.

 

H.B. 628 prohibits certain debt collection practices after a consumer has filed a report with a law enforcement agency related to identity theft.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.

 

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1.  Amends Section 392.303, Finance Code, by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (c), as follows:

 

(a)  Prohibits a debt collector from using unfair or unconscionable means in debt collection that employ certain practices, including collecting or attempting to collect an obligation under a check, draft, debit payment, or credit card payment, if certain circumstances related to identity theft apply.

 

(c)  Provides that Subsection (a)(3) does not prohibit a debt collector from collecting or attempting to collect an obligation under a check, draft, debit payment, or credit card payment if the debt collector has credible evidence, including a document, video recording, or witness statement, that the report filed with a law enforcement agency, as required by Subsection (a)(3)(C), is fraudulent and that the check, draft, or payment was authorized.

 

SECTION 2.  Effective date:  September 1, 2005.