BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

                                                                                                                                       C.S.S.B. 848

                                                                                                                                         By: Shapiro

                                                                                                          Land & Resource Management

                                                                                                        Committee Report (Substituted)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 

In 1999 the legislature reenacted an inadvertently repealed section of the Local Government Code that ensures property owners have the right to begin and complete the development of a project under the existing laws and regulations in effect when their first permit application is filed. Some property owners were investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in meeting local permit application requirements only to find that after filing an application, but before permit approval was granted, the local governments had adopted more restrictive development regulations, often with the express purpose of delaying or halting land development. This forced property owners to either restructure their projects at great cost or abandon them altogether when local regulatory changes made the project no longer viable.

 

Section 2(a) of Chapter 245 plainly states that development rights vest at the time the first application for the project is filed. In spite of this clear intent, current practice in some localities is to refuse to acknowledge vested rights until an application is “administratively complete,” meaning days or weeks of reviews and approvals. In 1999 the House rejected just such an amendment requiring administratively complete applications during floor debate.

 

The purpose of C.S.S.B. 848 is to clarify the intent of Chapter 245 that rights vest upon filing an application, regardless of local administrative procedural barriers. C.S.S.B. 848 also ensures that where local policies require an applicant to obtain utility commitments before the first permit can be filed, compliance with these requirements is considered the first permit for a project.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

It is the opinion of the committee that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency or institution.

 

ANALYSIS

 

SECTION 1.               Amends Subdivision (1), Section 245.001, Local Government Code, as                                            follows:

 

                                    Amends the definition of “Permit” to include a contract or agreement for                                       the construction or provision of services from a utility owned, operated, or                                     controlled by the regulatory agency.

 

SECTION 2.               Amends Section 245.002, Local Government Code, by amending                                                     Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) and (e)-(g), as follows:

 

                                    Clarifies that the permit application or plan for development is considered                                      filed when it is submitted for any purpose, including a submission for a                                          review of administrative completeness.

 

                                    Clarifies that the permit applicant’s rights accrue if the application or plan                                       of development gives the local regulatory authority fair notice of the                                               project and the nature of the permit sought. A “filed” application or plan is                                further clarified to mean one delivered to the regulatory authority or                                              deposited with the U.S. Postal Service by certified mail.

 

                                    Authorizes a regulatory agency that gives written notice within 10 days                                          after an application is filed of any additional information necessary to                                             meet its technical requirements to impose an expiration date on the permit                                        application of not less than 45 days.

 

                                    States that this chapter does not prevent a regulatory agency from                                                   requiring an applicant to meet all of its technical requirements in effect                                           when the application is filed.

 

                                    Includes transition language.

 

SECTION 3.               States explicitly that the changes made by this Act regarding the definition                                    of permit apply to projects as defined by Section 245.003.

 

SECTION 4.               Effective Date.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE

 

Effective date is September 1, 2005 or immediately if approved by two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

 

COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL TO SUBSTITUTE

 

SECTION 1.               No changes.

 

SECTION 2.               The Substitute adds language regarding requirements dealing with                                                  additional information necessary to meet technical requirements.

 

SECTION 3.               The Substitute contains a new Transition Clause.

 

SECTION 4.               No changes.