This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.


                                                                                

79R4092 JTS-F

By:  Hinojosa                                                     S.B. No. 699


A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the relationship between the amount of an administrative penalty imposed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the economic benefit of the violation to the alleged violator. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 7.053, Water Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 7.053. FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN DETERMINATION OF PENALTY AMOUNT. (a) In determining the amount of an administrative penalty, the commission shall consider: (1) the nature, circumstances, extent, duration, and gravity of the prohibited act, with special emphasis on the impairment of existing water rights or the hazard or potential hazard created to the health or safety of the public; (2) the impact of the violation on: (A) air quality in the region; (B) a receiving stream or underground water reservoir; (C) instream uses, water quality, aquatic and wildlife habitat, or beneficial freshwater inflows to bays and estuaries; or (D) affected persons; (3) with respect to the alleged violator: (A) the history and extent of previous violations; (B) the degree of culpability, including whether the violation was attributable to mechanical or electrical failures and whether the violation could have been reasonably anticipated and avoided; (C) the demonstrated good faith, including actions taken by the alleged violator to rectify the cause of the violation and to compensate affected persons; (D) the economic benefit gained through the violation; and (E) the amount necessary to deter future violations; and (4) any other matters that justice may require. (b) Except as otherwise provided by Section 7.052 and notwithstanding Subsection (a) of this section, in determining the amount of an administrative penalty, the commission shall, to the extent practicable, ensure that the amount of the penalty is at least equal to the value of any economic benefit gained by the alleged violator through the violation if the executive director determines that the violation could have been avoided through reasonable and prudent action by the alleged violator. SECTION 2. (a) The change in law made by this Act applies only to a violation that occurs on or after the effective date of this Act. For purposes of this section, a violation occurs before the effective date of this Act if any element of the violation occurs before that date. (b) A violation that occurs before the effective date of this Act is covered by the law in effect on the date the violation occurred, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2005.