TO: | Honorable Anna Mowery, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Deputy Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB323 by Mowery (Relating to a revision of the procedures for municipal annexation.), As Introduced |
The bill would change the procedures and requirements a municipality must follow when annexing or disannexing an area, whether for full or limited purposes, including requiring the municipality to hold an election in the municipality to obtain approval by the voters within the municipality. An election would also be required in the area to be annexed. A similar process would be required before an area could be disannexed. All elections related to annexing or disannexing would be required to be held on certain uniform election dates. The municipality would be responsible for the costs of holding an election.
If the municipality still owes any debts at the time of disannexation related to the area being disannexed, the municipality would have the authority to continue to impose a property tax each year at the same rate until the pro rata share of the area in the indebtedness is paid.
Authority related to annexation and other actions regarding boundaries that currently apply only to home-rule municipalities would apply to all municipalities under the provisions of the bill.
The bill would also repeal certain sections of the Local Government Code that would conflict with the new procedures. The bill would take effect immediately if it receives a two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2005. Processes begun prior to that date would be affected by either the new statute or the old depending on which procedure is occuring and at what stage the process has reached.
Under current statute, a municipality is authorized to annex or disannex an area without consent of the residents of the area.
Source Agencies: |
LBB Staff: | JOB, WK, CL, JB, DLBa
|