TO: | Honorable Will Hartnett, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Deputy Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB1418 by Gonzalez Toureilles (Relating to the justice court technology fund.), As Introduced |
If the expiration date were to remain in place, then after September 1, 2005, the counties in which the justice court technology fund exists would no longer be allowed to impose the court cost and would therefore experience the loss of a revenue source used for purchasing technology enhancements. Implementation of the provisions of the bill would allow the continuation of that revenue source. The amount of revenue generated would vary by county in which the fund has been established. The amount of revenue generated is not significant. For example, in fiscal year 2004, statewide there were 209,049 misdemeanor convictions reported in justice courts (based on an activity report generated online at the Office of Court Administration website). If every justice court were to have a technology fund and were to impose the maximum $4 court cost for each misdemeanor conviction, there would have been $836,196 in revenue generated in fiscal year 2004.
Source Agencies: |
LBB Staff: | JOB, DLBa
|