|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to the evidentiary use of certain judgments, orders, and |
|
docket sheets in a criminal case. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Article 38.33, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
Art. 38.33. PRESERVATION AND USE OF CERTAIN COURT DOCUMENTS |
|
AS EVIDENCE [OF CERTAIN MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS]. (a) A [Sec. 1.
|
|
The] court other than a justice or municipal court shall order that |
|
a defendant in a criminal action [who is convicted of a felony or a
|
|
misdemeanor offense that is punishable by confinement in jail] have |
|
the defendant's right [a] thumbprint or another of the defendant's |
|
fingerprints [of the defendant's right thumb] rolled legibly on the |
|
judgment, order, or [the] docket sheet in the case. [The court
|
|
shall order a defendant who is placed on probation under Section 5
|
|
of Article 42.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, for an offense
|
|
described by this section to have a thumbprint of the defendant's
|
|
right thumb rolled legibly on the order placing the defendant on
|
|
probation. If the defendant does not have a right thumb, the
|
|
defendant must have a thumbprint of the defendant's left thumb
|
|
rolled legibly on the judgment, order, or docket sheet. The
|
|
defendant must have a fingerprint of the defendant's index finger
|
|
rolled legibly on the judgment, order, or docket sheet if the
|
|
defendant does not have a right thumb or a left thumb.] The |
|
judgment, order, or docket sheet must contain a statement that |
|
specifies the [describes from which] thumb or finger from which the |
|
print was taken[, unless a rolled 10-finger print set was taken. A
|
|
clerk or bailiff of the court or other person qualified to take
|
|
fingerprints shall take the thumbprint or fingerprint, either by
|
|
use of the ink-rolled print method or by use of a live-scanning
|
|
device that prints the thumbprint or fingerprint image on the
|
|
judgment, order, or docket sheet]. The court may include in the |
|
records of the case additional information to identify the |
|
defendant. |
|
(b) A document authenticated in accordance with Subsection |
|
(a) is admissible in any criminal proceeding unless the document is |
|
void or has been set aside or otherwise withdrawn. |
|
(c) On introduction and admission into evidence of a |
|
document showing the name of the defendant and authenticated in |
|
accordance with Subsection (a), a presumption exists that the |
|
person named in the document and the defendant are the same person. |
|
The presumption exists only if the name appearing on the document is |
|
identical or substantially similar to the name of the defendant. |
|
Notice of intent to introduce evidence authenticated under this |
|
article shall be provided to the opposing party not later than the |
|
20th day before the date the trial begins. |
|
(d) A party may rebut the presumption under Subsection (c) |
|
by filing, not later than the 10th day before the date the trial |
|
begins, under oath subject to the penalty for perjury, a statement |
|
denying that the defendant is the person named in the document or |
|
otherwise providing a factual basis why the document should not be |
|
used as evidence in the case, including, if applicable, the fact |
|
that the document is void or was set aside or otherwise withdrawn. |
|
[Sec. 2. This article does not prohibit a court from
|
|
including in the records of the case additional information to
|
|
identify the defendant.] |
|
SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act. |
|
An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is |
|
covered by the law in effect when the offense was committed, and the |
|
former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of |
|
this section, an offense was committed before the effective date of |
|
this Act if any element of the offense was committed before that |
|
date. |
|
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2007. |