80R9080 JRH-F
 
  By: Hardcastle H.B. No. 2259
 
 
 
   
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the evidentiary use of certain judgments, orders, and
docket sheets in a criminal case.
       BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
       SECTION 1.  Article 38.33, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended to read as follows:
       Art. 38.33.  PRESERVATION AND USE OF CERTAIN COURT DOCUMENTS
AS EVIDENCE [OF CERTAIN MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS].  (a) A [Sec. 1.
The] court other than a justice or municipal court shall order that
a defendant in a criminal action [who is convicted of a felony or a
misdemeanor offense that is punishable by confinement in jail] have
the defendant's right [a] thumbprint or another of the defendant's
fingerprints [of the defendant's right thumb] rolled legibly on the
judgment, order, or [the] docket sheet in the case. [The court
shall order a defendant who is placed on probation under Section 5
of Article 42.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, for an offense
described by this section to have a thumbprint of the defendant's
right thumb rolled legibly on the order placing the defendant on
probation. If the defendant does not have a right thumb, the
defendant must have a thumbprint of the defendant's left thumb
rolled legibly on the judgment, order, or docket sheet. The
defendant must have a fingerprint of the defendant's index finger
rolled legibly on the judgment, order, or docket sheet if the
defendant does not have a right thumb or a left thumb.] The
judgment, order, or docket sheet must contain a statement that
specifies the [describes from which] thumb or finger from which the
print was taken[, unless a rolled 10-finger print set was taken. A
clerk or bailiff of the court or other person qualified to take
fingerprints shall take the thumbprint or fingerprint, either by
use of the ink-rolled print method or by use of a live-scanning
device that prints the thumbprint or fingerprint image on the
judgment, order, or docket sheet]. The court may include in the
records of the case additional information to identify the
defendant.
       (b)  A document authenticated in accordance with Subsection
(a) is admissible in any criminal proceeding unless the document is
void or has been set aside or otherwise withdrawn.
       (c)  On introduction and admission into evidence of a
document showing the name of the defendant and authenticated in
accordance with Subsection (a), a presumption exists that the
person named in the document and the defendant are the same person.
The presumption exists only if the name appearing on the document is
identical or substantially similar to the name of the defendant.  
Notice of intent to introduce evidence authenticated under this
article shall be provided to the opposing party not later than the
20th day before the date the trial begins.
       (d)  A party may rebut the presumption under Subsection (c)
by filing, not later than the 10th day before the date the trial
begins, under oath subject to the penalty for perjury, a statement
denying that the defendant is the person named in the document or
otherwise providing a factual basis why the document should not be
used as evidence in the case, including, if applicable, the fact
that the document is void or was set aside or otherwise withdrawn.
       [Sec. 2.  This article does not prohibit a court from
including in the records of the case additional information to
identify the defendant.]
       SECTION 2.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.
An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
covered by the law in effect when the offense was committed, and the
former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of
this section, an offense was committed before the effective date of
this Act if any element of the offense was committed before that
date.
       SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2007.