80R8364 JRH-F
 
  By: Veasey H.B. No. 2612
 
 
 
   
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to a study regarding the effectiveness of the James Byrd
Jr. Hate Crimes Act.
       BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
       SECTION 1.  Chapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended by adding Article 2.212 to read as follows:
       Art. 2.212.  STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF JAMES BYRD JR. HATE
CRIMES ACT. (a)  The attorney general shall conduct a study to
examine the success of Chapter 85, Acts of the 77th Legislature,
Regular Session, 2001, and subsequent amendments to that chapter.
       (b)  To accumulate data for purposes of Subsection (a), the
attorney general shall:
             (1)  conduct the study so that it identifies successful
strategies for prosecuting crimes of bias or prejudice and any
barriers or obstacles to use of the hate crimes law;
             (2)  examine the characteristics of crimes reported as
crimes of bias or prejudice and categorize each crime by:
                   (A)  type;
                   (B)  severity;
                   (C)  year of commission;
                   (D)  any protected class status of the victim;
                   (E)  any protected class status of the alleged
perpetrator; and
                   (F)  any other factor that would assist in
improving the effectiveness of the hate crimes law;
             (3)  for each crime identified under Subdivision (2),
examine:
                   (A)  whether an affirmative finding under the hate
crimes law was requested and obtained;
                   (B)  whether a protective order was requested and
obtained;
                   (C)  whether other charges related to the incident
were filed;
                   (D)  whether other convictions were obtained; and
                   (E)  if no affirmative finding was requested:
                         (i)  whether the alleged perpetrator was
ever identified;
                         (ii)  whether there was any basis found for
the affirmative finding or other charge; and
                         (iii)  whether a victim declined to
participate in the investigation;
             (4)  survey county attorneys, district attorneys, and
criminal district attorneys in whose jurisdictions complaints of
crimes of bias or prejudice have been made and determine:
                   (A)  the characteristics of crimes leading to
requests for affirmative findings under the hate crimes law;
                   (B)  whether there are barriers or disincentives
discouraging requests for affirmative findings; and
                   (C)  whether the availability of additional
resources would lead to a greater number of requests for
affirmative findings;
             (5)  interview a representative sample of victims of
crimes recorded as crimes of bias or prejudice and examine their
experiences with the hate crimes prosecution process to determine
problems, burdens, or disincentives to the prosecution of hate
crimes;
             (6)  for Section 22.111, Government Code, examine:
                   (A)  the amount of money appropriated for
prosecutorial training;
                   (B)  how many training sessions were provided;
                   (C)  how many training sessions were requested;
and
                   (D)  the number of attendees of any training
sessions provided;
             (7)  for Article 104.004 of this code, examine:
                   (A)  the amount of money appropriated;
                   (B)  the number of requests made for money and the
amounts requested; and
                   (C)  the total amount of money distributed;
             (8)  for Section 29.905, Education Code, examine:
                   (A)  the amount of money appropriated for
community and public curricula;
                   (B)  the results of any curriculum feedback model;
                   (C)  the number of requests for a curriculum;
                   (D)  when a curriculum was developed; and
                   (E)  the amount of any actual instruction under a
curriculum; and
             (9)  compare data regarding crimes of bias or prejudice
under state law, federal law, and the law of other states,
including:
                   (A)  reporting requirements;
                   (B)  the number of complaints made;
                   (C)  the number of prosecutions;
                   (D)  money available for prosecutions;
                   (E)  money available for education; and
                   (F)  other models for prosecution of, or education
about, crimes of bias or prejudice.
       (c)  The attorney general shall deliver a report to each
house of the legislature on the data collected under Subsection (b)
not later than January 1, 2009.
       (d)  This article expires February 1, 2009.
       SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
Act takes effect September 1, 2007.