By: West  S.B. No. 1016
         (In the Senate - Filed February 28, 2007; March 14, 2007,
  read first time and referred to Committee on Education;
  May 2, 2007, reported favorably by the following vote:  Yeas 7,
  Nays 0; May 2, 2007, sent to printer.)
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
 
  relating to providing a method for assessing the annual improvement
  in achievement of public school students on certain assessment
  instruments.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Subsection (j), Section 28.006, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (j)  No more than 15 percent of the funds certified by the
  commissioner under Subsection (i) may be spent on indirect costs.
  The commissioner shall evaluate the programs that fail to meet the
  standard of performance under Section 39.051(b)(10) [39.051(b)(8)]
  and may implement sanctions under Subchapter G, Chapter 39. The
  commissioner may audit the expenditures of funds appropriated for
  purposes of this section. The use of the funds appropriated for
  purposes of this section shall be verified as part of the district
  audit under Section 44.008.
         SECTION 2.  Section 39.022, Education Code, is amended to
  read as follows:
         Sec. 39.022.  ASSESSMENT PROGRAM.  The State Board of
  Education by rule shall create and implement a statewide assessment
  program that is knowledge- and skills-based to ensure school
  accountability for student achievement and academic growth that
  achieves the goals provided under Section 4.002. After adopting
  rules under this section, the State Board of Education shall
  consider the importance of maintaining stability in the statewide
  assessment program when adopting any subsequent modification of the
  rules.
         SECTION 3.  Section 39.023, Education Code, is amended by
  amending Subsections (l) and (n) and adding Subsection (o) to read
  as follows:
         (l)  The State Board of Education shall adopt rules for the
  administration of the assessment instruments adopted under
  Subsections [Subsection] (a) and (o) in Spanish to students in
  grades three through six who are of limited English proficiency, as
  defined by Section 29.052, whose primary language is Spanish, and
  who are not otherwise exempt from the administration of an
  assessment instrument under Section 39.027(a)(3) or (4). Each
  student of limited English proficiency whose primary language is
  Spanish, other than a student to whom Subsection (b) applies, may be
  assessed using assessment instruments in Spanish under this
  subsection for up to three years or assessment instruments in
  English under Subsection (a). The language proficiency assessment
  committee established under Section 29.063 shall determine which
  students are administered assessment instruments in Spanish under
  this subsection.
         (n)  This subsection applies only to a student who is
  determined to have dyslexia or a related disorder and who is an
  individual with a disability under 29 U.S.C. Section 705(20) and
  its subsequent amendments. The agency shall adopt or develop
  appropriate criterion-referenced assessment instruments designed
  to assess the ability of and to be administered to each student to
  whom this subsection applies for whom the assessment instruments
  adopted under Subsections [Subsection] (a) and (o), even with
  allowable modifications, would not provide an appropriate measure
  of student achievement, as determined by the committee established
  by the board of trustees of the district to determine the placement
  of students with dyslexia or related disorders. The committee
  shall determine whether any allowable modification is necessary in
  administering to a student an assessment instrument required under
  this subsection. The assessment instruments required under this
  subsection shall be administered on the same schedule as the
  assessment instruments administered under Subsection (a) and, if
  applicable, Subsection (o).
         (o)  The agency shall adopt or develop appropriate
  criterion-referenced assessment instruments, separate from the
  assessment instruments adopted or developed under Subsection (a),
  designed to assess reading progress by tracking changes in a
  student's performance during the school year.  A school district or
  open-enrollment charter school may administer an assessment
  instrument under this subsection. A campus that administers a
  reading assessment under this subsection must report the results to
  the agency.
         SECTION 4.  Subsections (b), (c), and (d), Section 39.051,
  Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
         (b)  Performance on the indicators adopted under this
  section shall be compared to state-established standards. The
  degree of change from one school year to the next in performance on
  each indicator adopted under this section shall also be considered.
  The indicators must be based on information that is disaggregated
  by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status and must
  include:
               (1)  the results of assessment instruments required
  under Sections 39.023(a), (c), and (l), aggregated by grade level
  and subject area;
               (2)  annual improvement in student achievement, as
  measured under Section 39.034, aggregated by grade level and
  subject;
               (3)  dropout rates, including dropout rates and
  district completion rates for grade levels 9 through 12, computed
  in accordance with standards and definitions adopted by the
  National Center for Education Statistics of the United States
  Department of Education;
               (4) [(3)]  high school graduation rates, computed in
  accordance with standards and definitions adopted in compliance
  with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. No. 107-110);
               (5) [(4)]  student attendance rates;
               (6) [(5)]  the percentage of graduating students who
  attain scores on the secondary exit-level assessment instruments
  required under Subchapter B that are equivalent to a passing score
  on the assessment instrument required under Section 51.3062;
               (7) [(6)]  the percentage of graduating students who
  meet the course requirements established for the recommended high
  school program by State Board of Education rule;
               (8)  if applicable, the results of assessment
  instruments administered under Section 39.023(o), aggregated by
  grade level;
               (9) [(7)]  the results of the Scholastic Assessment
  Test (SAT), the American College Test (ACT), articulated
  postsecondary degree programs described by Section 61.852, and
  certified workforce training programs described by Chapter 311,
  Labor Code;
               (10) [(8)]  the percentage of students, aggregated by
  grade level, provided accelerated instruction under Section
  28.0211(c), the results of assessments administered under that
  section, the percentage of students promoted through the grade
  placement committee process under Section 28.0211, the subject of
  the assessment instrument on which each student failed to perform
  satisfactorily, and the performance of those students in the school
  year following that promotion on the assessment instruments
  required under Section 39.023;
               (11) [(9)]  for students who have failed to perform
  satisfactorily on an assessment instrument required under Section
  39.023(a) or (c), the numerical progress of those students grouped
  by percentage on subsequent assessment instruments required under
  those sections, aggregated by grade level and subject area;
               (12) [(10)]  the percentage of students exempted, by
  exemption category, from the assessment program generally
  applicable under this chapter;
               (13) [(11)]  the percentage of students of limited
  English proficiency exempted from the administration of an
  assessment instrument under Sections 39.027(a)(3) and (4);
               (14) [(12)]  the percentage of students in a special
  education program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, assessed through
  assessment instruments developed or adopted under Section
  39.023(b);
               (15) [(13)]  the measure of progress toward
  preparation for postsecondary success; and
               (16) [(14)]  the measure of progress toward dual
  language proficiency under Section 39.034(b), for students of
  limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052.
         (c)  Performance on the indicators [indicator] under
  Subsections [Subsection] (b)(1) and (2) shall be compared to state
  standards, required improvement, and comparable improvement. The
  state standard shall be established by the commissioner. Required
  improvement is defined as the progress necessary for the campus or
  district to meet state standards and for its students to meet exit
  requirements as defined by the commissioner. Comparable
  improvement is derived by measuring campuses and districts against
  a profile developed from a total state student performance database
  which exhibits substantial equivalence to the characteristics of
  students served by the campus or district, including past academic
  performance, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and limited English
  proficiency.
         (d)  Annually, the commissioner shall define exemplary,
  recognized, and unacceptable performance for each academic
  excellence indicator included under Subsections (b)(1) through (9) 
  [(7)] and shall project the standards for each of those levels of
  performance for succeeding years.  For the indicator under
  Subsection (b)(10) [(b)(8)], the commissioner shall define
  exemplary, recognized, and unacceptable performance based on
  student performance for the period covering both the current and
  preceding academic years.  In defining exemplary, recognized, and
  unacceptable performance for the indicators under Subsections
  (b)(3) [(b)(2)] and (5) [(4)], the commissioner may not consider as
  a dropout or as a student who has failed to attend school a student
  whose failure to attend school results from:
               (1)  the student's expulsion under Section 37.007; and
               (2)  as applicable:
                     (A)  adjudication as having engaged in delinquent
  conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision, as defined by
  Section 51.03, Family Code; or
                     (B)  conviction of and sentencing for an offense
  under the Penal Code.
         SECTION 5.  Subsection (b), Section 39.052, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (b)  The report card shall include the following
  information:
               (1)  where applicable, the academic excellence
  indicators adopted under Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (12) 
  [(10)];
               (2)  average class size by grade level and subject;
               (3)  the administrative and instructional costs per
  student, computed in a manner consistent with Section 44.0071; and
               (4)  the district's instructional expenditures ratio
  and instructional employees ratio computed under Section 44.0071,
  and the statewide average of those ratios, as determined by the
  commissioner.
         SECTION 6.  Subsections (b) and (c), Section 39.072,
  Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
         (b)  The academic excellence indicators adopted under
  Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (10) [(8)] and the district's current
  special education compliance status with the agency shall be the
  main considerations of the agency in the rating of the district
  under this section. Additional criteria in the rules may include
  consideration of:
               (1)  compliance with statutory requirements and
  requirements imposed by rule of the State Board of Education under
  specific statutory authority that relate to:
                     (A)  reporting data through the Public Education
  Information Management System (PEIMS);
                     (B)  the high school graduation requirements
  under Section 28.025; or
                     (C)  an item listed in Sections
  7.056(e)(3)(C)-(I) that applies to the district;
               (2)  the effectiveness of the district's programs for
  special populations; and
               (3)  the effectiveness of the district's career and
  technology programs.
         (c)  The agency shall evaluate against state standards and
  shall, not later than August 1 of each year, report the performance
  of each campus in a district and each open-enrollment charter
  school on the basis of the campus's performance on the indicators
  adopted under Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (10) [(8)].
  Consideration of the effectiveness of district programs under
  Subsection (b)(2) or (3) must be based on data collected through the
  Public Education Information Management System for purposes of
  accountability under this chapter and include the results of
  assessments required under Section 39.023.
         SECTION 7.  Subsection (c), Section 39.0721, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (c)  The performance standards on which a gold performance
  rating is based should include:
               (1)  student proficiency on:
                     (A)  assessment instruments administered under
  Sections 39.023(a), (c), and (l); and
                     (B)  other measures of proficiency determined by
  the commissioner;
               (2)  student performance on one or more nationally
  recognized norm-referenced assessment instruments;
               (3)  improvement in student performance, including
  annual improvement in student achievement, as measured under
  Section 39.034;
               (4)  in the case of middle or junior high school
  campuses, student proficiency in mathematics, including algebra;
  and
               (5)  in the case of high school campuses:
                     (A)  the extent to which graduating students are
  academically prepared to attend institutions of higher education;
                     (B)  the percentage of students who take advanced
  placement tests and student performance on those tests; and
                     (C)  the percentage of students who take and
  successfully complete advanced academic courses or college-level
  course work offered through dual credit programs provided under
  agreements between high schools and institutions of higher
  education.
         SECTION 8.  Subsections (a), (b), and (f), Section 39.073,
  Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
         (a)  The agency shall annually review the performance of each
  district and campus on the indicators adopted under Sections
  39.051(b)(1) through (10) [(8)] and determine if a change in the
  accreditation status of the district is warranted. The
  commissioner may determine how all indicators adopted under Section
  39.051(b) may be used to determine accountability ratings and to
  select districts and campuses for acknowledgment.
         (b)  Each annual review shall include an analysis of the
  indicators under Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (10) [(8)] to
  determine district and campus performance in relation to:
               (1)  standards established for each indicator;
               (2)  required improvement as defined under Section
  39.051(c); and
               (3)  comparable improvement as defined by Section
  39.051(c).
         (f)  In the computation of dropout rates under Section
  39.051(b)(3) [39.051(b)(2)], a student who is released from a
  juvenile pre-adjudication secure detention facility or juvenile
  post-adjudication secure correctional facility and fails to enroll
  in school or a student who leaves a residential treatment center
  after receiving treatment for fewer than 85 days and fails to enroll
  in school may not be considered to have dropped out from the campus
  or school district serving the facility or center unless that
  campus or district is the one to which the student is regularly
  assigned.
         SECTION 9.  Subsection (e), Section 39.074, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (e)  If an annual review indicates low performance on one or
  more of the indicators under Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (10)
  [(8)] of one or more campuses in a district, the agency may conduct
  an on-site evaluation of those campuses only.
         SECTION 10.  Subsection (b), Section 39.114, Education Code,
  is amended to read as follows:
         (b)  A school district may use funds allocated under Section
  42.2516(b)(3) on any instructional program in grades six through 12
  other than an athletic program if:
               (1)  the district is recognized as exceptional by the
  commissioner under the academic accountability indicator adopted
  under Section 39.051(b)(15) [39.051(b)(13)]; and
               (2)  the district's completion rates for grades nine
  through 12 meet or exceed completion rate standards required by the
  commissioner to achieve a rating of exemplary under Section 39.072.
         SECTION 11.  (a)  Not later than the 2008-2009 school year,
  the Texas Education Agency shall collect information concerning
  annual improvement in student  achievement for purposes of
  Subdivision (2), Subsection (b), Section 39.051, Education Code, as
  amended by this Act.
         (b)  Not later than the 2009-2010 school year, the Texas
  Education Agency shall include, in evaluating the performance of
  school districts, campuses, and open-enrollment charter schools
  under Subchapter D, Chapter 39, Education Code, annual improvement
  in student achievement under Subdivision (2), Subsection (b),
  Section 39.051, Education Code, as amended by this Act.
         SECTION 12.  This Act applies beginning with the 2008-2009
  school year.
         SECTION 13.  This Act takes effect immediately if it
  receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each
  house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.  
  If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate
  effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2007.
 
  * * * * *