80R5437 SLO-F
 
  By: Ellis S.B. No. 1823
 
 
 
   
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to representation of applicants for writs of habeas corpus
in cases involving the death penalty.
       BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
       SECTION 1.  Section 2, Article 11.071, Code of Criminal
Procedure, is amended by amending Subsections (c) and (d) and
adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:
       (c)  At the earliest practical time, but in no event later
than 30 days, after the convicting court makes the findings
required under Subsections (a) and (b), the convicting court shall
appoint competent counsel, unless the applicant elects to proceed
pro se or is represented by retained counsel. Counsel appointed
under this subsection may include counsel appointed to assist an
attorney appointed as lead counsel under this section. On
appointing counsel under this section, the convicting court shall
immediately notify the court of criminal appeals of the
appointment, including in the notice a copy of the judgment and the
name, address, and telephone number of the appointed counsel.
       (d)  The court of criminal appeals shall adopt rules for the
appointment of attorneys as counsel under this article [section]
and the convicting court may appoint an attorney as counsel under
this article [section] only if the appointment is approved by the
court of criminal appeals in any manner provided by those rules.
The rules must require that an attorney appointed as lead counsel
under this section not have been found by a federal or state court
to have rendered ineffective assistance of counsel during the trial
or appeal of any capital case, unless the conduct underlying the
finding fails to accurately reflect the attorney's current ability
to provide effective representation.
       (g)  An attorney appointed or employed as counsel under this
article shall provide effective representation during the course of
proceedings under this article.
       SECTION 2.  Subsections (a), (b), and (d), Section 2A,
Article 11.071, Code of Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as
follows:
       (a)  The state shall reimburse a county for compensation of
counsel under Section 2 and payment of expenses under Section 3.
The total amount of reimbursement to which a county is entitled
under this section for attorney compensation for an application
under this article may not exceed $100,000 [$25,000]. The total
amount of reimbursement to which a county is entitled under this
section for reasonable expenses incurred by an attorney appointed
with respect to an application under this article may not exceed
$50,000. Compensation and expenses in excess of the $150,000
[$25,000] reimbursement that may be provided by the state are the
obligation of the county.
       (b)  A convicting court seeking reimbursement for a county
shall certify to the comptroller of public accounts the amount of
compensation that the county is entitled to receive under this
section. The comptroller of public accounts shall issue a warrant
to the county in the amount certified by the convicting court, not
to exceed a total amount of $100,000 for attorney compensation and
$50,000 for expenses [$25,000].
       (d)  The comptroller shall reimburse a county for the
compensation and payment of expenses of an attorney appointed by
the court of criminal appeals under prior law. A convicting court
seeking reimbursement for a county as permitted by this subsection
shall certify the amount the county is entitled to receive under
this subsection for an application filed under this article, not to
exceed a total amount of $100,000 for attorney compensation and
$50,000 for expenses [$25,000].
       SECTION 3.  Section 5(a), Article 11.071, Code of Criminal
Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
       (a)  If a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus
is filed after filing an initial application, a court may not
consider the merits of or grant relief based on the subsequent
application unless the court determines that considering the merits
or granting relief is in the best interest of justice or the
application contains sufficient specific facts establishing that:
             (1)  the current claims and issues have not been and
could not have been presented previously in a timely initial
application or in a previously considered application filed under
this article or Article 11.07 because the factual or legal basis for
the claim was unavailable on the date the applicant filed the
previous application;
             (2)  by a preponderance of the evidence, but for a
violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror could
have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; [or]
             (3)  by clear and convincing evidence, but for a
violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror would
have answered in the state's favor one or more of the special issues
that were submitted to the jury in the applicant's trial under
Article 37.071 or 37.0711;
             (4)  by clear and convincing evidence, the current
claims or issues were not raised previously in a timely initial
application under this article because the applicant was not
represented by competent counsel in filing the previous
application; or
             (5)  by clear and convincing evidence, the counsel who
prepared the initial application was subsequently found by the
court of criminal appeals to be ineligible for appointments under
rules adopted for appointment of attorneys as counsel under Section
2(d).
       SECTION 4.  Section 6, Article 11.071, Code of Criminal
Procedure, is amended by adding Subsection (b-1) to read as
follows:
       (b-1)  If the convicting court receives notice that the
requirements of Section 5(a) for consideration of a subsequent
application have been met, the convicting court shall appoint
counsel and provide for the compensation and reimbursement of
expenses of the counsel as is provided by Sections 2A and 3,
including compensation for time previously spent and reimbursement
of expenses previously incurred and regardless of whether the
subsequent application is ultimately dismissed.
       SECTION 5.  The change in law made by this Act applies to an
initial or subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus filed
on or after January 1, 2008. An application filed before January 1,
2008, is covered by the law in effect when the application was
filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
       SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2007.