TO: | Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Environmental Regulation |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB3231 by Olivo (Relating to the term of a municipal solid waste permit issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2008 | $0 |
2009 | $0 |
2010 | $0 |
2011 | $0 |
2012 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from HAZARDOUS/WASTE FEE ACCT 549 |
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2007 |
---|---|---|
2008 | ($718,712) | 9.0 |
2009 | ($660,212) | 9.0 |
2010 | ($660,212) | 9.0 |
2011 | ($660,212) | 9.0 |
2012 | ($660,212) | 9.0 |
According to the TCEQ, there currently are no term limits for municipal solid waste permits. The only time a permit is revisited is when a major amendment is submitted. A ten-year renewal cycle would not change TCEQ responsibilities, but it is expected to substantially increase the agency's workload with respect to municipal solid waste permit application reviews. Although the bill would allow the commission to implement its requirements over any period of time considered necessary for administrative feasibility and effectiveness, this estimate assumes that all municipal solid waste permits would be treated the same to consistently apply the requirements of the bill to all permitees. In addition to application review, the TCEQ would be required to conduct additional public meetings, provide notice of such meetings, and respond to questions and comments.
The TCEQ expects that 80 percent of applications for municipal solid waste permits would require a public meeting and 60 percent would require a contested case hearing. The TCEQ predicts that municipal solid waste permit application reviews would more than triple from an approximate 12 application reviews per year to approximately 43 application reviews, assuming 31 additional permit renewal reviews per year on a 10-year cycle from an overall universe of approximately 315 issued permits.
It is estimated that 9 additional FTEs would be required at the TCEQ to implement the provisions of the bill at a cost of $718,712 in fiscal year 2008, which includes equipment, furniture, and computer acquisition, and $660,212 in future years. This estimate assumes that costs would be paid out of the General Revenue-Dedicated Waste Management Account No. 549.
Additional permit application reviews would also result in additional application review fees being charged to applicants. Given the current fee rate of $150 per application and 43 additional applicants, the bill's passage is expected to result in $6,450 per fiscal year in additional revenue to the Waste Management Account No. 549. This estimate assumes that such a revenue increase would not be a significant gain to the account.
Source Agencies: | 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
|
LBB Staff: | JOB, WK, ZS, TL
|