LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
80TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 4, 2007

TO:
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB126 by Delisi (Relating to the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity. ), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

The bill would amend the Penal Code by adding tampering with a governmental record as one of the offenses for which a person can commit the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity.  The offense of tampering with a governmental record currently is punishable as a Class A misdemeanor, a state jail felony, a felony of the third degree, or a felony of the second degree, depending on the type of record involved in the offense and the intent to defraud or harm another. 

 

A state jail felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail for any term of not more than two years or less than 180 days, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

 

A third degree felony is punishable by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

 

A second degree felony is punishable by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 20 years or less than 2 years, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000. 

 

The engaging in organized criminal activity provision of the Penal Code allows for the enhancement of the penalty for included offenses.  By including the offense of tampering with a governmental record in the engaging in organized criminal activity provision, the bill would allow for the possibility of increasing the punishment to the next level.  Increasing the penalty for any criminal offense is expected to result in increased demands upon the correctional resources of counties or of the State due to longer terms of probation, or, longer terms of confinement in county jails or prison. When an offense is changed from a misdemeanor to a felony, there is a transfer of the burden of confinement of convicted offenders from the counties to the State. In fiscal year 2006, 105 admissions to the institutional division, 107 admissions to state jail, and 1,167 additions to felony community supervision, were convicted of the offense of tampering with governmental records.  Assuming the same number of offenders in future years, the additional impact to criminal justice populations from the bill would depend on the number of times the enhancement provision would be applied.  The probable impact of implementing this provision of the bill cannot be determined due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the circumstances involved in the offense of tampering with a governmental record.

 

The bill would also amend the Penal Code to include obtaining, possessing, transferring, or using without legal authorization identifying information concerning a deceased person for the conditions regarding the offense of fraudulent use or possession of a person’s identifying information.  The offense of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information is punishable as a state jail felony.  The bill would define intent to harm or defraud another as the possession of: 1) identifying information of three or more other persons without consent, 2) identifying information of three or more deceased persons without legal authorization, or 3) identifying information of three or more persons without consent or deceased persons without legal authorization.  No significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources and services of those agencies is anticipated from this provision of the bill that authorize or require a change in the sanctions applicable to adults convicted of felony crimes.



Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
JOB, TM, GG