LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
80TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 20, 2007

TO:
Honorable Aaron Pena, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB3584 by Pena (Relating to the creation of the offense of organized retail theft. ), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

The bill would amend the Penal Code by creating the offense of organized retail theft.  Conducting, promoting, or facilitating an activity in which a person receives, possess, conceals, stores, barters, sells, or disposes of stolen retail merchandise would constitute an offense under the provisions of this bill.  Punishment for organized retail theft would range from a state jail felony (value of merchandise is $1,500 or more but less than $20,000) to a first degree felony ($200,000 or more) and would depend on the total value of the merchandise involved. 

A state jail felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail for any term of not more than two years or less than 180 days, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

A felony of the third degree is punishable by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

A felony of the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 20 years or less than 2 years, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

A felony of the first degree is punishable by imprisonment in the institutional division for any term of not more than 99 years or less than 5 years, or, in addition to confinement, a fine not to exceed $10,000.

Punishment for the offenses described in the proposal would be increased to the next higher category of offense for persons that organize, supervise, finance, or manage one or more other persons engaged in the activity. 

The impact of the bill on correctional populations would depend on how many persons would be prosecuted under the provision of the bill, and the extent to which punishment would be enhanced under the proposed statute compared to existing statute.  For this analysis it is assumed that the number of offenders convicted under this statute would not result in a significant impact on the programs and workload of state corrections agencies or on the demand for resources and services of those agencies.



Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
JOB, GG, LM