LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT
 
80TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 13, 2007

TO:
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB619 by Jackson, Mike (Relating to a firefighters' relief and retirement fund in certain municipalities.), As Introduced


Fiscal Year 2006

HOUSTON FIREFIGHTERS’ RELIEF AND

RETIREMENT FUND

Current

Proposed

Difference

 

City of Houston Contribution

Employee Contribution

Total Contribution

 

           23.80 %

             9.00 %

            32.80 %

 

23.80 %

  9.00 %

32.80 %

 

0.00

      0.00

0.00

Normal Cost (%of payroll)

             20.90 %

20.90 %

0.00%

Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (millions)

            $2,461,142

$2,461,142

$0.00

Amortization Period (years) as of 7/1/2005*

          N/A

N/A

0.0

*The current contribution rate is insufficient to amortize the unfunded liability over a 30-year period. Currently, the total contribution rate necessary to maintain a 30-year funding period is 42.50% of payroll. The actual contribution rate, based on the July 1, 2005 actuarial valuation, is 32.80%, or a shortfall of 9.7% of payroll.

A Glossary of Actuarial Terms is provided at the end of this impact statement.

 

 

ACTUARIAL EFFECTS:

 

It is a matter of some concern that the bill would remove the Houston Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund from the protections embodied in state Trust law. This could weaken protections for the members of the fund and potentially adversely affect the fund's actuarial status in the long run, though the precise impact is unknown.

 

According to the actuary of the Houston Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (HFRRF), the proposals in SB 619 do not pose any material actuarial effect to the fund. The effect of prorating the 2% increase in the monthly benefit upon exiting the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) could result in a modest savings to the fund, but the savings are small enough that the actuary did not attempt to quantify the actual savings. Under the proposal to establish a Post-Retirement Option Plan (PROP), fund earnings above the return ceiling of 10% would provide a gain for the fund; however, fund earnings below the minimum crediting rate of 5% would result in losses to the fund.

 

 

SYNOPSIS OF PROVISIONS:

 

This bill, to be effective immediately if receiving required votes or if not, September 1, 2007, would provide the following:

 

 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

 

According to the actuary of the Houston Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (HFRRF), the proposals in SB 619 do not pose any material actuarial effect to the fund. The effect of prorating the 2% increase in the monthly benefit upon exiting the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) could result in a modest savings to the fund, but the savings are small enough that the actuary did not attempt to quantify the actual savings. Under the proposal to establish a Post-Retirement Option Plan (PROP), fund earnings above the return ceiling of 10% would provide a gain for the fund; however, fund earnings below the minimum crediting rate of 5% would result in losses to the fund.

 

The July 1, 2005 actuarial valuation of HFRRF indicated a 30-year contribution rate for fiscal year 2006 of 42.50% of payroll, whereas the actual contribution rate for HFRRF was 32.80%, representing a shortfall of 9.7% of payroll. Actual city contributions for fiscal year 2007are expected to be less than the actuarially determined city contribution rate, with a projected shortfall of 7.2% of payroll.

 

METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS:

 

The analysis relies on the participant data, financial information, benefit structure and actuarial assumptions and methods used in the July 1, 2005 actuarial valuation of HFRRF.  According to the PRB actuary, the actuarial assumptions and methods appear to be reasonable.  All actuarial projections have a degree of uncertainty because they are based on the probability of occurrence of future contingent events. The cost estimates in the analysis are subject to the uncertainties of a regular valuation; the costs are inexact because they are based on assumptions that are themselves necessarily inexact, even though considered reasonable. Thus, the emerging costs may vary from those presented in the analysis to the extent actual experience differs from that projected by the actuarial assumptions.

 

SOURCES:

 

Actuarial Analysis by Bruce W. Jenkins, Actuary, Buck Consultants, March 5, 2007

Actuarial Review by Mr. Richard E. White, & Robert L. Schmidt, Actuaries, Milliman USA, Inc., March 5, 2007

 

GLOSSARY OF ACTUARIAL TERMS:

 

Normal Cost-- the current cost as a percentage of payroll that is necessary to pre-fund pension benefits adequately during the course of an employee's career.

 

Unfunded Liability-- the amount of total liabilities that are not covered by the total assets of a retirement system.  Both liabilities and assets are measured on an actuarial basis using certain assumptions including average annual salary increases, the investment return of the retirement fund, and the demographics of retirement system members.

 

Amortization Period-- the number of years required to pay-off the unfunded liability.  Public retirement systems have found that amortization periods ranging from 20 to 40 years are acceptable.  State law prohibits changes in TRS, ERS, or JRS-2 benefits or state contribution rates if the result is an amortization period exceeding 30.9 years.



Source Agencies:
338 Pension Review Board
LBB Staff:
JOB, WM