LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
80TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 16, 2007

TO:
Honorable Jerry Madden, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB838 by Whitmire (Relating to the revocation or modification of parole or mandatory supervision.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

The bill would amend the Hearings and Sanctions Subchapter of the Government Code by specifying conditions under which a parole panel may require a person to remain under custodial supervision each time the board modifies a person’s parole or mandatory supervision.  The bill would set a term of not less than 180 days or more than one year for a person with a modified parole or mandatory supervision term modified by a parole panel and required to serve a term of confinement and treatment in a substance abuse treatment facility.  The bill also prohibits a parole panel from revoking a person’s parole or mandatory supervision for an administrative violation of a condition of release, or for an offense punishable as a misdemeanor committed after release.  A parole panel may revoke a person's parole or mandatory supervision if the person has failed to report to the parole officer supervising the person for a period of at least one year, or is arrested outside of the state on an issued warrant. 
 
The bill would amend the Hearings and Sanctions Subchapter of the Government Code by specifying a term of not less than 60 days or more than one year for a person who has violated the terms of their parole or mandatory supervision and is required by a parole panel to remain under custodial supervision in an intermediate sanction facility. The bill would allow a parole panel to require a person to remain under custodial supervision each time the panel modifies the person’s parole or mandatory supervision.  Sex offenders or those under super-intensive supervision parole would be ineligible for diversion from prison under the provisions of this bill.
 
In fiscal year 2006, 2,238 admissions to TDCJ were for technical revocations of terms of parole or mandatory supervision.  Also, 1,882 admissions to TDCJ were for new misdemeanor offenses resulting in revocations of parole or mandatory supervision that would be ineligible for revocation under the provisions of this bill.  TDCJ estimates that in fiscal year 2006, 500 technical revocations to prison were individuals failing to report to their supervising parole officer for a period of at least one year.  Savings would result from the bill as a result of parole and mandatory supervision violators being diverted from prison to substance abuse treatment facilities or intermediate sanction facilities rather than prison.  After excluding sex offenders and offenders on super-intensive supervision parole prior to revocation, and after excluding those defendants with an administrative violation that have failed to report to the supervision parole officer for a period of at least one year, there are 3,137 parole technical or misdemeanor violators eligible for diversion.  With an average length of stay of three months, 780 intermediate sanction facility beds would accommodate approximately 3,137 persons with technical or misdemeanor violations of parole or mandatory supervision.  Conversely, 3,137 persons revoked to prison for technical or misdemeanor violations of parole or mandatory supervision are likely to require 6,274 prison beds assuming an average length of stay of two years. 
 
Assuming that sentencing patterns and release policies not addressed in this bill remain constant, the probable impact of implementing the provisions of the bill during each of the first five years following passage, in terms of daily demand upon the adult corrections agencies, is estimated as follows:



Fiscal Year Decrease In Demand For Prison Capacity Increase In Release Population
2008 682 682
2009 2,604 2,604
2010 4,468 4,468
2011 5,563 5,663
2012 6,579 6,579


Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
JOB, TM, GG