This website will be unavailable from Thursday, May 30, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, June 3, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

	Amend HCR 220 as follows:                                                    

(1)  On page 2, between lines 14 and 15, insert the 	following:               
	WHEREAS, Patronage of casinos in Texas would predominantly 
come from the population that lives within a 50-mile radius of the 
facilities, and economic development after the construction of a 
facility would only result in a transfer of dollars from within the 
existing local consumer economy, which would damage existing 
businesses and family-friendly tourism and diminish sales tax 
revenue; it is recognized and acknowledged that for a certain 
percentage of the population, gambling is not a form of 
entertainment but an addiction, and that the real harm that results 
from casinos includes an immense increase in the total number of 
pathological gamblers in this state; reputable, independent 
economists estimate that for every $1 in benefits derived from 
casino-style gambling, there will be $3 in costs related to the 
activity; the additional costs resulting from the expansion of 
casinos in Texas would be absorbed by friends, family members, and 
local, county, and state governmental entities; and
	WHEREAS, National and historic properties in the State of 
Texas should be protected from any attempt to expand casino-style 
gambling; the state has contractual agreements with Indian tribes 
both inside and outside the state that recognize historic 
properties of the tribes in Texas and allow these properties to be 
listed in the National Register of Historic Places; any expansion 
of casinos or video lottery terminals in Texas would constitute 
approval of Class III games in the state as defined by the Indian 
Gaming Regulatory Act; the approval of Class III games in Texas 
would have the immediate effect of allowing Indian tribes, both 
inside and outside the state, with historic properties and heritage 
in our state, to potentially open gaming facilities throughout 
Texas with little state or local community input or oversight; such 
attempts in other states have resulted in long and costly 
litigation, at great expense to the taxpayers of those states; and
	(2)  On page 2, between lines 25 and 26, insert the 
following:               
	RESOLVED, That any study or report on the gaming industry 
expansion into Texas include a cost-benefit analysis that considers 
both the social and economic costs related to the expansion of 
casino-style gambling, the effect on existing sales tax revenue, 
and the effect on Texas lottery sales, as well as an analysis of the 
tax rates on dollars wagered in the casino business model and the 
effect on the existing local economies and family-friendly tourism; 
and, be it further
	RESOLVED, That any study or report also include a complete 
analysis of any agreements between the State of Texas and Indian 
tribes regarding historic or real properties of Indian tribes in 
the state, and that the analysis include but not be limited to a 
complete review of Indian gaming expansion across the United 
States, including current litigation and case law, and how Indian 
historic and real properties have been leveraged to expand casino 
gaming into areas that had not been previously considered Indian 
land; and, be it further