System updates will be applied on February 19, 2026 at 6:00 PM. These updates will include changes to the user interface. Work is expected to take approximately 30 minutes to complete, during which the site will be unavailable.

	
Amend CSSB 73 (Senate committee printing) as follows:                        
	(1)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 156.001, 
Education Code (page 1, between lines 23 and 24), insert the 
following new Subdivision (2) and renumber subsequent subdivisions 
of that section appropriately:

		(2)  "Advisory committee" means the advisory committee 
appointed under Section 156.006.
	(2)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 156.006, 
Education Code (page 2, lines 52-56), strike Subsection (a) and 
substitute the following:
	(a)  An advisory committee is established to make 
recommendations based on prevailing international best practices 
in adult stem cell research to assist the research oversight 
committee in performing its duties.  The research oversight 
committee shall consult with the advisory committee to develop 
grant and loan application procedures for research proposals 
submitted by consortium participants.
	(3)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Chapter 156, 
Education Code (page 2, between lines 67 and 68), insert the 
following:
	Sec. 156.007.  PEER REVIEW PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA.  (a)  The 
advisory committee shall establish procedures and criteria for peer 
review of applications for grants and loans for proposed research 
projects consistent with national and international standards, 
including the enhanced review criteria for the evaluation of 
research applications received for potential funding in fiscal year 
2010 and the associated scoring procedures used by the National 
Institutes of Health.  The advisory committee shall establish 
conflict of interest standards regarding peer reviewers consistent 
with 42 C.F.R. Section 52h.5.
	(b)  The advisory committee shall select reviewers for the 
peer review process based on a reviewer's training and experience 
in relevant scientific, medical, or technical fields, taking into 
account:
		(1)  the formal scientific or technical education 
completed;         
		(2)  relevant research engaged in by the person, 
including whether the person was the principal researcher;
		(3)  any awards, honors, or other recognition received 
from scientific, professional, and medical organizations; and
		(4)  the need to include experts from various areas of 
specialization within relevant scientific, medical, or technical 
fields.
	(c)  Notwithstanding Subsection (b), not more than 50 
percent of the peer reviewers for an application may be residents of 
this state.
	(d)  A peer reviewer is not an officer or employee of this 
state.     
	(4)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 156.007, 
Education Code (page 3, lines 17-25), strike Subsection (b) and 
substitute the following:
	(b)  The research oversight committee shall refer all grant 
and loan applications to the advisory committee for competitive, 
peer review evaluation of the medical, scientific, and technical 
merits of the proposed research project.  The advisory committee 
shall, giving consideration to the substance and results of peer 
review of individual research project proposals, recommend to the 
research oversight committee acceptance or rejection of an 
individual grant or loan application.
	(5)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Section 156.007(d), 
Education Code (page 3, line 33), between "writing" and "and", 
insert "not later than the 14th day after the date of the decision".

	(6)  In SECTION 1 of the bill, in added Chapter 156, 
Education Code, renumber sections and correct cross-references 
appropriately (page 2, line 68, and page 3, lines 34, 37, 41, and 
47).