By: Thompson, Dutton, Moody, et al. H.B. No. 1152
 
  Substitute the following for H.B. No. 1152:
 
  By:  Miklos C.S.H.B. No. 1152
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital
  offense committed by a person with mental retardation.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Title I, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended
  by adding Chapter 46D to read as follows:
         CHAPTER 46D.  CAPITAL CASE: EFFECT OF MENTAL RETARDATION
         Art. 46D.01.  DEFINITION. In this chapter, "mental
  retardation" has the meaning assigned by Section 591.003, Health
  and Safety Code.
         Art. 46D.02.  RESTRICTION ON DEATH PENALTY.  Notwithstanding
  Section 19.03, Penal Code, a defendant convicted of a capital
  offense who is determined under this chapter to be a person with
  mental retardation may not be sentenced to death.
         Art. 46D.03.  INTENT TO RAISE MENTAL RETARDATION AS ISSUE.
  (a) A defendant in a capital case may request:
               (1)  that the judge hearing the case hold a pre-trial
  hearing to determine whether the defendant is a person with mental
  retardation; and
               (2)  the submission of a special issue to the jury under
  Section 2(e)(2), Article 37.071.
         (b)  The defendant must file a notice of intent to request a
  pretrial hearing under Section 2(e)(2), Article 37.071 with the
  court and the attorney representing the state not later than the
  60th day before the date the trial commences.
         Art. 46D.04.  PRETRIAL HEARING. A judge shall hold a
  pretrial hearing. After presentation of the evidence, a judge shall
  make a determination that the defendant is a person with mental
  retardation or is not a person with mental retardation.
         Art. 46D.05.  BURDEN OF PROOF. At a hearing under this
  chapter, the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance
  of the evidence that the defendant is a person with mental
  retardation.
         Art. 46D.06.  SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES. (a) If the judge
  determines that the defendant was a person with mental retardation
  and the defendant is subsequently convicted of the offense, the
  judge may sentence the defendant to imprisonment in the Texas
  Department of Criminal Justice for life without parole.
         (b)  If the judge determines that the defendant was not a
  person with mental retardation, the judge shall conduct the trial
  in the same manner as if a hearing under this chapter had not been
  held. At the trial of the offense:
               (1)  the jury may not be informed of the fact that the
  judge has determined under this article that the defendant was not
  a person with mental retardation; and
               (2)  the defendant may present at trial evidence of
  mental disability as permitted by Article 37.071.
         (c)  The judge must make the determination of mental
  retardation before the trial of the offense commences under Section
  19.03, Penal Code.
         Art. 46D.07.  APPOINTMENT OF DISINTERESTED EXPERTS. On the
  request of either party or on the judge's own motion, the judge
  shall appoint two disinterested experts experienced and qualified
  in the field of diagnosing mental retardation to independently
  examine the defendant and determine whether the defendant is a
  person with mental retardation. The judge may order the defendant
  to submit to an examination by experts appointed under this
  article.
         Art. 46D.08.  CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAW.  If the judge
  determines that the defendant was not a person with mental
  retardation and the defendant is subsequently convicted of the
  offense, the fact finder's determination:
               (1)  does not preclude the defendant from filing a
  motion under Article 46.05; and
               (2)  notwithstanding Article 46.05(j), is not
  admissible as evidence in a hearing under Article 46.05.
         Art. 46D.09.  SENTENCING PHASE SPECIAL ISSUE FOR JURY. (a)
  The court shall allow the jury to consider the evidence whether the
  defendant is a person with mental retardation offered by the
  attorney representing the state or the defendant.
         (b)(1)  If after considering all findings offered under
  Subsection (a) the jury finds by a preponderance of the evidence
  that the defendant is a person with mental retardation, the court
  may sentence the defendant to imprisonment as provided by Section
  2(j), Article 37.071.
               (2)  If the jury does not find that the defendant is a
  person with mental retardation, the court may sentence the
  defendant to death as provided by Section 2(g), Article 37.071.
         Art. 46D.10.  APPEAL. Upon conviction and sentencing, the
  defendant and the state are entitled to appeal a finding of a court
  described in this Article.
         SECTION 2.  Section 2(a)(1), Article 37.071, Code of
  Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
         (a)(1)  If a defendant is tried for a capital offense in
  which the state seeks the death penalty, on a finding that the
  defendant is guilty of a capital offense, the court shall conduct a
  separate sentencing proceeding to determine whether the defendant
  shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole.
  The proceeding shall be conducted in the trial court and, except as
  provided by Article 44.29(c) of this code, before the trial jury as
  soon as practicable.  In the proceeding, evidence may be presented
  by the state and the defendant or the defendant's counsel as to any
  matter that the court deems relevant to sentence, including
  evidence of the defendant's background or character or the
  circumstances of the offense that mitigates against the imposition
  of the death penalty, including evidence as to whether the
  defendant is a person with mental retardation.  This subdivision
  shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any
  evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United
  States or of the State of Texas. The state and the defendant or the
  defendant's counsel shall be permitted to present argument for or
  against sentence of death. The introduction of evidence of
  extraneous conduct is governed by the notice requirements of
  Section 3(g), Article 37.07. The court, the attorney representing
  the state, the defendant, or the defendant's counsel may not inform
  a juror or a prospective juror of the effect of a failure of a jury
  to agree on issues submitted under Subsection (c) or (e).
         SECTION 3.  Chapter 6, Penal Code, is amended by adding
  Section 6.05 to read as follows:
         Sec. 6.05.  MENTAL RETARDATION AFFECTING DEATH SENTENCE.
  (a)  In this section, "mental retardation" has the meaning assigned
  by Section 591.003, Health and Safety Code.
         (b)  A person with mental retardation may not be punished by
  death.
         SECTION 4.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
  to a capital case that commences on or after the effective date of
  this Act. A capital case that commences before the effective date of
  this Act is covered by the law in effect when the case commenced,
  and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
         SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.