81R28056 CLG-D
 
  By: Truitt H.B. No. 2260
 
  Substitute the following for H.B. No. 2260:
 
  By:  Madden C.S.H.B. No. 2260
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to a determination of whether a probate court of this state
  is a more appropriate forum than a court of another state with
  respect to guardianship proceedings involving adults.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Sections 894(a) and (d), Texas Probate Code, are
  amended to read as follows:
         (a)  A court in which a guardianship proceeding is filed for
  a minor and in which venue of the proceeding is proper may delay
  further action in the proceeding in that court if:
               (1)  another guardianship proceeding involving a
  matter at issue in the proceeding filed in the court is subsequently
  filed in a court in a foreign jurisdiction;  and
               (2)  venue of the proceeding in the foreign court is
  proper.
         (d)  The court shall resume the guardianship proceeding
  involving a minor if the court determines that venue is more
  suitable in that court.  If the court determines that venue is more
  suitable in the foreign court, the court shall, with the consent of
  the foreign court, transfer the proceeding to the foreign court.
         SECTION 2.  Subpart G, Part 5, Chapter XIII, Texas Probate
  Code, is amended by adding Section 895 to read as follows:
         Sec. 895.  DETERMINATION OF MOST APPROPRIATE FORUM FOR
  GUARDIANSHIP PROCEEDINGS FOR ADULTS. (a) This section applies
  only to a guardianship proceeding in which an order for the
  appointment of a guardian for an adult is sought or has been issued.
         (b)  In this section, "incapacitated adult" means an adult
  ward or an adult for whom the appointment of a guardian is sought,
  as applicable.
         (c)  A court of this state having jurisdiction under this
  chapter or venue under Section 610 of this code to appoint a
  guardian shall decline to exercise its jurisdiction if the court
  determines at any time that a court of another state is a more
  appropriate forum.
         (d)  If a court of this state declines to exercise its
  jurisdiction under Subsection (c) of this section, the court shall
  either dismiss or stay the guardianship proceeding. The court may
  impose any condition the court considers just and proper, including
  the condition that a petition for the appointment of a guardian or
  issuance of a protective order be filed promptly in another state.
         (e)  In determining whether it is an appropriate forum, a
  court of this state shall consider all relevant factors, including:
               (1)  any expressed preference of the incapacitated
  adult;
               (2)  whether abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the
  incapacitated adult has occurred or is likely to occur and which
  state could best protect the adult from the abuse, neglect, or
  exploitation;
               (3)  the length of time the incapacitated adult was
  physically present in or was a legal resident of this or another
  state;
               (4)  the distance of the incapacitated adult from the
  court in each state;
               (5)  the financial circumstances of the incapacitated
  adult's estate;
               (6)  the nature and location of the evidence;
               (7)  the ability of the court in each state to decide
  the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present
  evidence;
               (8)  the familiarity of the court of each state with the
  facts and issues in the proceeding; and
               (9)  if an appointment were made, the court's ability to
  monitor the conduct of the guardian of the person or estate, or
  both.
         (f)  If at any time a court of this state determines that it
  acquired jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of the person or
  estate, or both, of an adult ward because of unjustifiable conduct,
  the court may:
               (1)  decline to exercise jurisdiction;
               (2)  exercise jurisdiction for the limited purpose of
  fashioning an appropriate remedy to ensure the health, safety, and
  welfare of the incapacitated adult or the protection of the
  incapacitated adult's property or prevent a repetition of the
  unjustifiable conduct, including staying the proceeding until a
  petition for the appointment of a guardian or issuance of a
  protective order is filed in a court of another state having
  jurisdiction; or
               (3)  continue to exercise jurisdiction after
  considering:
                     (A)  the extent to which the incapacitated adult
  and all persons required to be notified of the proceedings have
  acquiesced in the exercise of the court's jurisdiction;
                     (B)  whether the court of this state is a more
  appropriate forum than the court of any other state under the
  factors set forth in Subsection (e) of this section; and
                     (C)  whether the court of any other state would
  have jurisdiction under the factual circumstances of the matter.
         (g)  If a court of this state determines that it acquired
  jurisdiction to appoint a guardian of the person or estate, or both,
  of an adult ward because a party seeking to invoke its jurisdiction
  engaged in unjustifiable conduct, it may assess against that party
  necessary and reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees,
  investigative fees, court costs, communication expenses, witness
  fees and expenses, and travel expenses. The court may not assess
  fees, costs, or expenses of any kind against this state or a
  governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of this state
  unless authorized by other law.
         SECTION 3.  The changes in law made by this Act apply only to
  a guardianship proceeding filed on or after the effective date of
  this Act. A guardianship proceeding filed before the effective
  date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the
  proceeding was filed, and the former law is continued in effect for
  that purpose.
         SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.