|
|
|
R E S O L U T I O N
|
|
WHEREAS, The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, |
|
more commonly known as the 2002 Farm Bill, included provisions |
|
requiring country of origin labeling (COOL) for beef, lamb, pork, |
|
fish, perishable agricultural commodities, and peanuts; and |
|
WHEREAS, In response to widespread controversy, the United |
|
States Congress agreed to delay full mandatory implementation of |
|
COOL; although labeling requirements under a final rule are taking |
|
effect on March 16, 2009, agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack has |
|
called for voluntary compliance under stricter guidelines, warning |
|
of a possible tightening of regulations at a later time; and |
|
WHEREAS, The United States Department of Agriculture has |
|
estimated that incremental costs of compliance with the final rule |
|
will reach $2.6 billion in the first year for growers, producers, |
|
processors, wholesalers, and retailers; in the 10th year after |
|
implementation, the estimated cost to the United States economy |
|
would be more than $211 million in higher food prices and reduced |
|
food production; meanwhile, the USDA has concluded that economic |
|
benefits associated with COOL implementation are likely to be |
|
small; and |
|
WHEREAS, Current evidence does not suggest that consumers are |
|
willing to pay a premium price for food items bearing the United |
|
States origin label, or that United States producers will be able to |
|
recoup costs associated with COOL compliance through higher prices; |
|
and |
|
WHEREAS, COOL is a marketing program, not a food safety |
|
measure, as evidenced by the fact that it is administered by the |
|
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the USDA rather than its |
|
Food Safety and Inspection Service or Animal and Plant Health |
|
Inspection Service; and |
|
WHEREAS, COOL regulations are extremely burdensome for the |
|
cattle industry; cattle are not considered a covered commodity |
|
under COOL regulations, but producers are obligated to provide |
|
origin information in order for retailers to verify the origin of |
|
meat; cattle are often bought and sold several times and move |
|
through a complex and diverse set of stocker and feedlot production |
|
systems involving a high degree of sorting and commingling, which |
|
increases the difficulty of tracking domestic and imported cattle; |
|
and |
|
WHEREAS, Mexico and Canada, the top two export markets for |
|
U.S. beef, have both filed complaints against COOL provisions with |
|
the World Trade Organization; in December 2008, Mexico briefly |
|
banned imports from 30 U.S. meat plants in a move widely considered |
|
to be a protest against COOL, which drove cattle futures sharply |
|
lower at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; and |
|
WHEREAS, Texas leads the nation in cattle production; the |
|
industry contributes as much as $16 billion annually to the state |
|
economy, and it is vitally important that normal trade relations |
|
continue with key beef export markets; the COOL provisions are |
|
harmful both to trade relations and to the overall economic |
|
viability of the cattle industry as well as to consumers, who can |
|
expect to see prices rise as a result of higher production costs; |
|
now, therefore, be it |
|
RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives of the 81st Texas |
|
Legislature hereby respectfully urge the United States Congress to |
|
repeal mandatory country of origin labeling provisions from federal |
|
law as soon as practicable; and, be it further |
|
RESOLVED, That the chief clerk of the Texas House of |
|
Representatives forward official copies of this resolution to the |
|
president of the United States, to the speaker of the house of |
|
representatives and the president of the senate of the United |
|
States Congress, to the secretary of agriculture, and to all the |
|
members of the Texas delegation to the Congress with the request |
|
that this resolution be officially entered in the Congressional |
|
Record as a memorial to the Congress of the United States of |
|
America. |