|
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to energy efficiency goals and programs and demand |
|
reduction targets; creating an office of energy efficiency |
|
deployment in the state energy conservation office. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Section 39.905, Utilities Code, is amended by |
|
amending Subsections (a), (b), and (d) and adding Subsections |
|
(a-1), (a-2), (b-5), (d-1), (d-2), (d-3), (e-1), (h), (i), and (j) |
|
to read as follows: |
|
(a) It is the goal of the legislature that: |
|
(1) electric utilities will administer energy |
|
efficiency incentive programs in a market-neutral, |
|
nondiscriminatory manner but will not offer underlying competitive |
|
services; |
|
(2) electric utilities will assist in building an |
|
infrastructure of trained and qualified energy service providers |
|
that will allow and encourage the participation of retail electric |
|
providers in the delivery of services and that will ensure that all |
|
customers, in all customer classes, will have a choice of and access |
|
to energy efficiency alternatives and other choices from the |
|
market, including demand-side renewable energy systems, that allow |
|
each customer to reduce energy consumption, peak demand, or energy |
|
costs; |
|
(3) except as provided by Subsection (b)(8), each |
|
electric utility annually will provide, through a cost-effective |
|
portfolio of market-based standard offer programs or limited, |
|
targeted, market-transformation programs, incentives sufficient |
|
for retail electric providers and competitive energy service |
|
providers to acquire additional [cost-effective] energy efficiency |
|
for [residential and commercial] customers other than customers who |
|
operate a transmission-level industrial facility, equivalent to at |
|
least: |
|
(A) 30 [10] percent of the electric utility's |
|
annual growth in demand, not including demand from |
|
transmission-level industrial facilities, [of residential and
|
|
commercial customers] by January 1, 2012 [December 31, 2007]; |
|
(B) one-half of one [15] percent of the electric |
|
utility's peak [annual growth in] demand, not including demand from |
|
transmission-level industrial facilities, [of residential and
|
|
commercial customers] by January 1, 2013; and |
|
(C) one percent of the electric utility's peak |
|
demand, not including demand from transmission-level industrial |
|
facilities, by January 1, 2016 [December 31, 2008, provided that
|
|
the electric utility's program expenditures for 2008 funding may
|
|
not be greater than 75 percent above the utility's program budget
|
|
for 2007 for residential and commercial customers, as included in
|
|
the April 1, 2006, filing; and
|
|
[(C)
20 percent of the electric utility's annual
|
|
growth in demand of residential and commercial customers by
|
|
December 31, 2009, provided that the electric utility's program
|
|
expenditures for 2009 funding may not be greater than 150 percent
|
|
above the utility's program budget for 2007 for residential and
|
|
commercial customers, as included in the April 1, 2006, filing]; |
|
(4) each electric utility in the ERCOT region shall |
|
create specific programs sufficient to [use its best efforts to
|
|
encourage and] facilitate the involvement of the region's retail |
|
electric providers in the widespread delivery of efficiency |
|
programs and programs for demand-side renewable energy systems |
|
[demand response programs] under this section; |
|
(5) retail electric providers in the ERCOT region, and |
|
electric utilities outside of the ERCOT region, shall provide |
|
customers with energy efficiency educational materials; [and] |
|
(6) notwithstanding Subsection (a)(3), electric |
|
utilities shall continue to make available, at 2007 funding and |
|
participation levels, any load management standard offer programs |
|
developed for industrial customers and implemented prior to May 1, |
|
2007; |
|
(7) electric utilities will make their best efforts to |
|
ensure continuity in funding for market-based standard offer |
|
programs with proven demand at levels consistent with that demand; |
|
(8) a customer who participates in a standard offer |
|
load management or demand response program is not precluded from |
|
participating in other load management or demand response programs |
|
during different intervals; and |
|
(9) for an electric utility operating solely outside |
|
of ERCOT in areas of this state that were included in the Western |
|
Electricity Coordinating Council on January 1, 2009, the utility |
|
may: |
|
(A) continue to provide standard offer programs, |
|
limited and targeted market transformation programs, or programs |
|
that address the major barriers to energy efficiency as required by |
|
Subdivision (3); or |
|
(B) provide energy efficiency programs and |
|
measures directly to a class of customers. |
|
(a-1) ERCOT annually shall compute the sum of all measurable |
|
and verifiable demand response and load management capacity |
|
independently implemented by electric utilities, retail electric |
|
providers, and the independent organization certified under |
|
Section 39.151, including programs used to shift load off-peak or |
|
reduce local or systemwide peak demand. |
|
(a-2) The commission shall determine whether the |
|
implementation of additional measures or programs is necessary to |
|
facilitate demand response. An additional demand response measure |
|
or program implemented under this subsection must not impede the |
|
proper functioning of the electricity market in ERCOT or increase |
|
net electricity costs for customers. To the extent that demand |
|
response programs can satisfy the reasonable requirements of |
|
ancillary services, and consistent with reliability requirements, |
|
the commission shall ensure that demand response programs have the |
|
opportunity to compete with generation, including the provision of |
|
ancillary services. |
|
(b) Subject to the limitations of Subsection (b-5), the |
|
[The] commission shall provide oversight and adopt rules and |
|
procedures to ensure that the utilities can achieve the goal of this |
|
section, including: |
|
(1) establishing an energy efficiency cost recovery |
|
factor for ensuring timely and reasonable cost recovery for utility |
|
expenditures made to satisfy the goal of this section; |
|
(2) establishing an incentive under Section 36.204 to |
|
reward utilities administering programs under this section that |
|
exceed the minimum goals established by this section; |
|
(3) providing a utility that is unable to establish an |
|
energy efficiency cost recovery factor in a timely manner due to a |
|
rate freeze with a mechanism to enable the utility to: |
|
(A) defer the costs of complying with this |
|
section; and |
|
(B) recover the deferred costs through an energy |
|
efficiency cost recovery factor on the expiration of the rate |
|
freeze period; |
|
(4) ensuring that the costs associated with programs |
|
provided under this section are borne by the customer classes that |
|
receive the services under the programs; [and] |
|
(5) ensuring that programs are implemented in a manner |
|
in which program incentives are passed on to end-use customers |
|
through rebates, discounts on products and services, and other |
|
direct benefits that reduce the costs of the products and services |
|
to the end-use customer; |
|
(6) ensuring that standard offer programs operate at a |
|
scale sufficient to ensure that all eligible customers have access |
|
to the programs and program benefits under this section; |
|
(7) establishing a minimum standard offer payment |
|
available to all eligible customers that may be reduced by the |
|
amount of other available state incentives equal to at least 70 |
|
percent of avoided cost as determined by the commission for the |
|
installation of demand-side renewable energy systems; |
|
(8) on application by a utility, and when considered |
|
necessary by the commission, increasing or decreasing the demand |
|
reduction goals under Subsection (a) based on each utility's |
|
capacity to implement efficiency measures and demand response |
|
programs, and providing incentives under Section 36.204 to reward |
|
utilities administering programs under this section that exceed the |
|
minimum goals established under this section; |
|
(9) without compromising the ability to achieve |
|
statewide energy efficiency goals, developing different standards |
|
for program offerings in remote regions of this state and for |
|
program offerings in regions of this state where the demand for |
|
energy efficiency services exceeds the local utilities' capacity to |
|
provide them, to allow a utility to partner with local governments |
|
and community organizations to provide energy efficiency services; |
|
and |
|
(10) establishing standards for consumer disclosures |
|
by energy services companies that include the expected reduction of |
|
energy consumption, the anticipated payback period, and disclosure |
|
of any incentive received from the energy service provider from the |
|
state or federal government [the program rules encourage the value
|
|
of the incentives to be passed on to the end-use customer]. |
|
(b-5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, |
|
the average of the aggregate cost for programs under this section |
|
for individual utilities located in areas in which customer choice |
|
has been introduced may not exceed $0.0010 per kilowatt hour for |
|
nontransmission level customers in any calendar year, regardless of |
|
whether the costs: |
|
(1) are part of the utility's energy efficiency cost |
|
recovery factor under this section; or |
|
(2) are included in the utility's most recent base rate |
|
case. |
|
(d) The commission shall establish a procedure for |
|
reviewing and evaluating market-transformation program options |
|
described by this section [subsection] and other options. A |
|
market-transformation program that is launched as a pilot program |
|
may be continued for more than three years only if the commission |
|
determines that the pilot program is an appropriate means of |
|
addressing special market barriers that prevent or inhibit the |
|
measure or behavior addressed by the pilot program from being |
|
delivered or adopted through normal market channels, under the |
|
electric utility's standard offer programs [In evaluating program
|
|
options, the commission may consider the ability of a program
|
|
option to reduce costs to customers through reduced demand, energy
|
|
savings, and relief of congestion.
Utilities may choose to
|
|
implement any program option approved by the commission after its
|
|
evaluation in order to satisfy the goal in Subsection (a),
|
|
including:
|
|
[(1) energy-smart schools;
|
|
[(2) appliance retirement and recycling;
|
|
[(3) air conditioning system tune-ups;
|
|
[(4)
the use of trees or other landscaping for energy
|
|
efficiency;
|
|
[(5)
customer energy management and demand response
|
|
programs;
|
|
[(6)
high performance residential and commercial
|
|
buildings that will achieve the levels of energy efficiency
|
|
sufficient to qualify those buildings for federal tax incentives;
|
|
[(7)
programs for customers who rent or lease their
|
|
residence or commercial space;
|
|
[(8)
programs providing energy monitoring equipment
|
|
to customers that enable a customer to better understand the
|
|
amount, price, and time of the customer's energy use;
|
|
[(9)
energy audit programs for owners and other
|
|
residents of single-family or multifamily residences and for small
|
|
commercial customers;
|
|
[(10) net-zero energy new home programs;
|
|
[(11) solar thermal or solar electric programs; and
|
|
[(12)
programs for using windows and other glazing
|
|
systems, glass doors, and skylights in residential and commercial
|
|
buildings that reduce solar gain by at least 30 percent from the
|
|
level established for the federal Energy Star windows program]. |
|
(d-1) In addition to the market-transformation programs |
|
described by Subsection (d), the commission may establish, and if |
|
established, each electric utility may implement, |
|
market-transformation incentive programs that: |
|
(1) encourage the use of new building technologies and |
|
construction practices that are anticipated to be included in a new |
|
edition of the International Residential Code or International |
|
Energy Conservation Code; |
|
(2) offer incentives for a building that meets federal |
|
Energy Star standards or exceeds by at least 15 percent the energy |
|
conservation standards of the most current edition of the |
|
International Residential Code or International Energy |
|
Conservation Code; |
|
(3) offer increased incentives for a building that |
|
exceeds by at least 30 percent the energy conservation standards of |
|
the most current edition of the International Residential Code or |
|
International Energy Conservation Code; and |
|
(4) encourage the testing of new building technologies |
|
and construction practices that integrate renewable energy into |
|
building designs. |
|
(d-2) Each electric utility shall administer an energy |
|
efficiency program designed to also meet an energy savings goal |
|
calculated from its demand savings goal, using a 25 percent |
|
capacity factor. For purposes of this subsection, "capacity |
|
factor" is defined as the ratio of the utility's annual energy |
|
savings goal, in kilowatt hours, to the peak demand goal for the |
|
year, in kilowatts, multiplied by the number of hours in the year. |
|
(d-3) A utility may work with municipalities or other |
|
governmental entities to establish building energy codes that |
|
promote greater energy efficiency than the minimum standards |
|
required by state or local law. If a utility and governmental |
|
entity develop a building energy code under this subsection, the |
|
utility may count not more than 50 percent of the savings in peak |
|
demand and energy savings that result in the first 12 months after |
|
the code is implemented toward the utility's goal for energy |
|
efficiency. |
|
(e-1) The commission shall exempt costs related to |
|
marketing, information dissemination, and training from the |
|
requirements of Subsection (e). |
|
(h) In this section, "demand-side renewable energy system" |
|
means an energy generation system that: |
|
(1) uses distributed renewable generation, as defined |
|
by Section 39.916; or |
|
(2) reduces the need for energy consumption by using a |
|
renewable energy technology or natural mechanism of the |
|
environment, including a geothermal heat pump or solar water |
|
heater. |
|
(i) An electric utility that was not subject to this section |
|
on January 1, 2009, is subject to the energy efficiency goals of |
|
this section on the effective date of the utility's final rates as |
|
determined in the utility's first rate case filed with the |
|
commission on or after January 1, 2010. |
|
(j) Notwithstanding any other law, this section shall apply |
|
to each electric utility, as defined by Section 31.002. |
|
SECTION 2. Chapter 447, Government Code, is amended by |
|
adding Section 447.0025 to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 447.0025. OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY DEPLOYMENT. (a) |
|
The office of energy efficiency deployment is created in the state |
|
energy conservation office. |
|
(b) The office of energy efficiency deployment shall design |
|
and implement a statewide campaign to educate consumers, utilities, |
|
and public entities about, and to promote the use of, energy |
|
efficiency and demand response programs available in the state. |
|
The office of energy efficiency deployment and the state energy |
|
conservation office may enter into contracts for professional |
|
services to carry out this statewide campaign. |
|
(c) In designing and implementing a campaign under |
|
Subsection (b), the office of energy efficiency deployment shall |
|
collaborate with retail electric providers, transmission and |
|
distribution utilities, and energy service providers. |
|
SECTION 3. (a) The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall |
|
conduct a study paid for by electric utilities regarding the |
|
feasibility of mechanisms to decouple electric utility revenues and |
|
earnings from the amount of electricity consumed by utility |
|
customers so that investor-owned electric utilities, electric |
|
transmission and distribution utilities, municipally owned |
|
electric utilities, and electric cooperatives may prevent |
|
fluctuations in retail electric energy consumption from affecting |
|
the ability of those types of utilities to recover fixed costs of |
|
service that do not ordinarily vary directly with changes in |
|
electric energy consumption or sales volume. |
|
(b) The study must address: |
|
(1) disincentives to the promotion of efficient use of |
|
electricity by better practices and better technology, including |
|
concerns regarding: |
|
(A) a utility's lost revenues from electricity |
|
sales that may result from energy efficiency improvements or energy |
|
saving practices that reduce electricity consumption; and |
|
(B) a utility's recovery of the utility's costs |
|
for programs promoting electric energy efficiency; and |
|
(2) the effects of decoupling electric utility |
|
revenues and earnings from the amount of electricity consumed by |
|
customers, including the effect decoupling would have on low-income |
|
customers. |
|
(c) In conducting the study, the Public Utility Commission |
|
of Texas may consider and evaluate mechanisms proposed or applied |
|
in other states for: |
|
(1) allowing rates of return on energy efficiency |
|
investments in a manner like those for other capital investments; |
|
(2) providing an increased rate of return on overall |
|
investments or on energy efficiency investments; |
|
(3) providing financial incentives for meeting energy |
|
efficiency targets; and |
|
(4) recovering energy efficiency program costs. |
|
(d) The study may not be performed by a person: |
|
(1) who performs services for an electric utility; |
|
(2) who has performed services for an electric utility |
|
in the two years before the study begins; or |
|
(3) who is in the process of bidding to perform |
|
services for an electric utility at the time the study begins. |
|
(e) The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall report the |
|
conclusions of the study to the lieutenant governor, the speaker of |
|
the house of representatives, and each committee of the 82nd |
|
Legislature that has jurisdiction over electric utilities. |
|
(f) The report must: |
|
(1) include recommendations tailored by category to |
|
investor-owned electric utilities, electric transmission and |
|
distribution utilities, municipally owned electric utilities, and |
|
electric cooperatives; |
|
(2) include recommendations on the use of a credit |
|
trading system to achieve increased energy efficiency; and |
|
(3) state: |
|
(A) whether decoupling will result in an increase |
|
in the installation of energy efficiency measures by consumers; |
|
(B) whether decoupling will result in higher or |
|
lower energy bills for consumers; |
|
(C) whether decoupling will result in higher or |
|
lower electricity rates; |
|
(D) whether decoupling will result in lower risk |
|
to electric utilities; and |
|
(E) whether electric utility rates of return |
|
should be reduced as a result of decoupling. |
|
(g) The report and recommendations must be delivered not |
|
later than January 31, 2011, and must contain specific |
|
recommendations regarding transmission and distribution utility |
|
revenues and earnings in relation to electric energy efficiency, |
|
including legislative proposals. |
|
SECTION 4. (a) The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall |
|
conduct a study paid for by electric utilities regarding the |
|
programs offered under Section 39.905, Utilities Code. The study |
|
must address: |
|
(1) the effectiveness of the programs required by |
|
Section 39.905, Utilities Code, and whether the cost caps described |
|
by Subsection (b-5) of that section should be revised; |
|
(2) the feasibility of increasing existing energy |
|
efficiency efforts to achieve a two percent reduction of electric |
|
utility peak demand, not including demand from transmission level |
|
industrial facilities, not later than January 1, 2021; |
|
(3) an assessment of the cost impact, by customer |
|
class, on a dollar per kilowatt hour basis, necessary to achieve: |
|
(A) a one percent reduction in electric utility |
|
peak demand, not including demand from transmission level |
|
customers, not later than January 1, 2016; and |
|
(B) a two percent reduction in electric utility |
|
peak demand, not including demand from transmission level |
|
customers, not later than January 1, 2021; and |
|
(4) the level of free ridership on programs described |
|
by Section 39.905, Utilities Code. |
|
(b) The study may not be performed by a person: |
|
(1) who performs services for an electric utility; |
|
(2) who has performed services for an electric utility |
|
in the two years before the study begins; or |
|
(3) who is in the process of bidding to perform |
|
services for an electric utility at the time the study begins. |
|
(c) Not later than December 15, 2012, the Public Utility |
|
Commission of Texas shall report the conclusions of the study to the |
|
lieutenant governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, |
|
and each committee of the 82nd Legislature that has jurisdiction |
|
over electric utilities. |
|
SECTION 5. The Public Utility Commission of Texas shall |
|
conduct a study paid for by electric utilities regarding the |
|
potential for demand response and load management programs in this |
|
state. Not later than January 15, 2011, the commission shall submit |
|
to the legislature a report of the commission's findings. The |
|
report must: |
|
(1) identify the types of demand response and load |
|
management programs that are most effective in: |
|
(A) reducing systemwide peak demand; |
|
(B) reducing local peak demand; |
|
(C) keeping downward pressure on electricity |
|
rates; |
|
(D) reducing emissions; and |
|
(E) facilitating the integration of renewable |
|
energy resources in the electric grid or otherwise improving the |
|
reliability of the grid; |
|
(2) provide estimates of the economic and achievable |
|
potential in this state for each identified program in terms of: |
|
(A) peak demand reductions; |
|
(B) electricity rate reductions; |
|
(C) emissions savings; and |
|
(D) avoided costs of generation, transmission, |
|
and distribution; |
|
(3) quantify the costs, effects on rates, potential |
|
cost savings, and other economic benefits of each identified |
|
program: |
|
(A) for the electricity market in this state; and |
|
(B) for consumers in this state, by customer |
|
class on a dollar per kilowatt hour basis; |
|
(4) state whether each identified program would be |
|
most effective if administered by: |
|
(A) the independent organization certified under |
|
Section 39.151; |
|
(B) electric utilities; |
|
(C) retail electric providers; or |
|
(D) the independent organization certified under |
|
Section 39.151, electric utilities, or retail electric providers in |
|
combination; |
|
(5) state whether residential elderly customers, |
|
critical care residential customers, or low-income residential |
|
customers would be unfairly affected by, or would experience any |
|
harmful health effects from, each identified program; |
|
(6) identify potential barriers to the successful |
|
creation of, operation of, and participation in wholesale or retail |
|
demand response and load management programs; |
|
(7) state whether the creation of additional demand |
|
response or load management programs would have an adverse effect |
|
on existing demand response and load management programs; and |
|
(8) state whether demand response and load management |
|
programs would achieve reductions in statewide peak demand of five |
|
percent by January 1, 2016, and identify policies, goals, and |
|
programs that would facilitate the achievement of that goal. |
|
SECTION 6. Section 39.905(b-2), Utilities Code, is |
|
repealed. |
|
SECTION 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009. |