|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
|
relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in |
|
connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater |
|
conservation district in accordance with its management plan. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Section 36.001, Water Code, is amended by adding |
|
Subdivision (28-a) to read as follows: |
|
(28-a) "Evidence of beneficial use" means evidence |
|
that is material and relevant to a determination of the amount of |
|
groundwater that is reasonable for a beneficial use without waste |
|
proposed by a permit applicant consistent with generally accepted |
|
agriculture or industry standards for the proposed type of use and |
|
does not exclude innovations in agriculture or industry practices. |
|
Evidence of beneficial use that satisfies the requirements of |
|
Subdivision (9)(C) includes evidence that may be in the form of a: |
|
(A) statutory requirement applicable to an |
|
applicant who is a supplier of water to the public to provide |
|
continuous and adequate water service consistent with the state |
|
water plan; or |
|
(B) contractual obligation applicable to the |
|
applicant for the use of the water based on a demonstrated need for |
|
the water by an end user. |
|
SECTION 2. Subsection (a), Section 36.1071, Water Code, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
(a) Following notice and hearing, the district shall, in |
|
coordination with surface water management entities on a regional |
|
basis, develop a comprehensive management plan which addresses the |
|
following management goals, as applicable: |
|
(1) providing the most efficient use of groundwater; |
|
(2) controlling and preventing waste of groundwater; |
|
(3) controlling and preventing subsidence; |
|
(4) addressing conjunctive surface water management |
|
issues; |
|
(5) addressing natural resource issues; |
|
(6) addressing drought conditions; |
|
(7) addressing conservation, recharge enhancement, |
|
rainwater harvesting, precipitation enhancement, or brush control, |
|
where appropriate and cost-effective; [and] |
|
(8) addressing in a quantitative manner the desired |
|
future conditions of the groundwater resources; and |
|
(9) addressing the ability of the district's |
|
groundwater resources to meet the future water supply needs of the |
|
district and this state as established in the adopted state water |
|
plan, including any water management strategy dependent on use of |
|
the district's groundwater resources. |
|
SECTION 3. Subsection (g), Section 36.1072, Water Code, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
(g) In this subsection, "development board" means the Texas |
|
Water Development Board. A person with a legally defined interest |
|
in groundwater in a district or in the management area in which a |
|
district is located or a [the] regional water planning group |
|
dependent on a district's groundwater resources to meet a water |
|
management strategy identified in the adopted state water plan may |
|
file a petition with the development board stating that a conflict |
|
requiring resolution may exist between the district's approved |
|
management plan developed under Section 36.1071 and the state water |
|
plan. If a conflict exists, the development board shall provide |
|
technical assistance to and facilitate coordination between the |
|
involved person or regional water planning group and the district |
|
to resolve the conflict. Not later than the 45th day after the date |
|
the person or the regional water planning group files a petition |
|
with the development board, if the conflict has not been resolved, |
|
the district and the involved person or regional planning group may |
|
mediate the conflict. The district and the involved person or |
|
regional planning group may seek the assistance of the Center for |
|
Public Policy Dispute Resolution at The University of Texas School |
|
of Law or an alternative dispute resolution system established |
|
under Chapter 152, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, in obtaining a |
|
qualified impartial third party to mediate the conflict. The cost |
|
of the mediation services must be specified in the agreement |
|
between the parties and the Center for Public Policy Dispute |
|
Resolution or the alternative dispute resolution system. If the |
|
district and the involved person or regional planning group cannot |
|
resolve the conflict through mediation, the development board shall |
|
resolve the conflict not later than the 60th day after the date the |
|
mediation is completed. The development board action under this |
|
provision may be consolidated, at the option of the board, with |
|
related action under Section 16.053(p). If the development board |
|
determines that resolution of the conflict requires a revision of |
|
the approved groundwater conservation district management plan, |
|
the development board shall provide information to the |
|
district. The district shall prepare any revisions to the plan |
|
based on the information provided by the development board and |
|
shall hold, after notice, at least one public hearing at some |
|
central location within the district. The district shall consider |
|
all public and development board comments, prepare, revise, and |
|
adopt its plan, and submit the revised plan to the development board |
|
for approval. On the request of the district or the regional water |
|
planning group, the development board shall include discussion of |
|
the conflict and its resolution in the state water plan that the |
|
development board provides to the governor, the lieutenant |
|
governor, and the speaker of the house of representatives under |
|
Section 16.051(e). If the groundwater conservation district |
|
disagrees with the decision of the development board under this |
|
subsection, the district may appeal the decision to a district |
|
court in Travis County. Costs for the appeal shall be set by the |
|
court hearing the appeal. An appeal under this subsection is by |
|
trial de novo. |
|
SECTION 4. Subsections (c), (f), and (l), Section 36.108, |
|
Water Code, are amended to read as follows: |
|
(c) The presiding officer, or the presiding officer's |
|
designee, of each district located in whole or in part in the |
|
management area shall meet at least annually to conduct joint |
|
planning with the other districts in the management area and to |
|
review the management plans and accomplishments for the management |
|
area. In reviewing the management plans, the districts shall |
|
consider: |
|
(1) the goals of each management plan and its impact on |
|
planning throughout the management area and this state as |
|
established by the adopted state water plan; |
|
(2) the effectiveness of the measures established by |
|
each management plan for conserving and protecting groundwater and |
|
preventing waste, and the effectiveness of these measures in the |
|
management area generally; |
|
(3) any other matters that the boards consider |
|
relevant to the protection and conservation of groundwater and the |
|
prevention of waste in the management area; and |
|
(4) the degree to which each management plan achieves |
|
the desired future conditions established during the joint planning |
|
process. |
|
(f) A district, regional water planning group dependent on |
|
the groundwater resources in the groundwater management area to |
|
meet a water management strategy identified in the adopted state |
|
water plan, or person with a legally defined interest in the |
|
groundwater within the management area may file a petition with the |
|
commission requesting an inquiry if a district or districts refused |
|
to join in the planning process or the process failed to result in |
|
adequate planning, including the establishment of reasonable |
|
future desired conditions of the aquifers, and the petition |
|
provides evidence that: |
|
(1) a district in the groundwater management area has |
|
failed to adopt rules; |
|
(2) the rules adopted by a district are not designed to |
|
achieve the desired future condition of the groundwater resources |
|
in the groundwater management area established during the joint |
|
planning process; |
|
(3) the groundwater in the management area is not |
|
adequately protected by the rules adopted by a district; or |
|
(4) the groundwater in the groundwater management area |
|
is not adequately protected due to the failure of a district to |
|
enforce substantial compliance with its rules. |
|
(l) A person with a legally defined interest in the |
|
groundwater in the groundwater management area, a district in or |
|
adjacent to the groundwater management area, or a regional water |
|
planning group dependent on the groundwater resources [for a
|
|
region] in the groundwater management area to meet a water |
|
management strategy identified in the adopted state water plan may |
|
file a petition with the development board appealing the approval |
|
of the desired future conditions of the groundwater resources |
|
established under this section. The petition must provide |
|
evidence that the districts did not establish a reasonable desired |
|
future condition of the groundwater resources in the groundwater |
|
management area. |
|
SECTION 5. Section 36.113, Water Code, is amended by adding |
|
Subsection (e-1) to read as follows: |
|
(e-1) A district may not grant a permit unless the applicant |
|
provides evidence of beneficial use. |
|
SECTION 6. Subchapter D, Chapter 36, Water Code, is amended |
|
by adding Section 36.1133 to read as follows: |
|
Sec. 36.1133. PREPRODUCTION PERMITS. (a) A district may |
|
adopt rules to authorize the issuance of a preproduction permit to |
|
an applicant if the applicant has met the requirements for a |
|
production permit but is unable to provide documentation of a need |
|
to supply water for a purpose included in an approved regional water |
|
plan. |
|
(b) The term of a preproduction permit issued under this |
|
section must be five years. |
|
(c) If, before the expiration of a preproduction permit, the |
|
holder of the permit provides to the district that issued the permit |
|
a copy of a water supply contract or other documentation of an |
|
obligation to supply water for a purpose included in an approved |
|
regional water plan, the district shall convert the preproduction |
|
permit to a production permit for that purpose and for the amount of |
|
production authorized by the preproduction permit. |
|
SECTION 7. Section 36.122, Water Code, is amended by |
|
amending Subsection (f) and adding Subsection (r) to read as |
|
follows: |
|
(f) In reviewing a proposed transfer of groundwater out of |
|
the district, the district shall consider: |
|
(1) the availability of water in the district and in |
|
the proposed receiving area during the period for which the water |
|
supply is requested; |
|
(2) the projected effect of the proposed transfer on |
|
aquifer conditions, depletion, subsidence, or effects on existing |
|
permit holders or other groundwater users within the district; and |
|
(3) the approved [regional water plan and certified] |
|
district management plan. |
|
(r) A district may not grant a permit that allows the |
|
transfer of groundwater outside the district for municipal use |
|
unless the municipal use is established by a contractual obligation |
|
described by Section 36.001(28-a)(B). |
|
SECTION 8. Subsection (e-1), Section 36.113, and Section |
|
36.1133, Water Code, as added by this Act, and Section 36.122, Water |
|
Code, as amended by this Act, apply only to an application for a |
|
permit that is submitted to a groundwater conservation district on |
|
or after the effective date of this Act. An application submitted |
|
before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in |
|
effect on the date the application was submitted, and that law |
|
continues in effect for that purpose. |
|
SECTION 9. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives |
|
a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as |
|
provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this |
|
Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this |
|
Act takes effect September 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
* * * * * |