This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

 
 
  By: Hegar S.C.R. No. 47
 
 
 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
         WHEREAS, Grandfather's Blind, Ltd., and Donner Properties
  allege that:
               (1)  Grandfather's Blind, Ltd., owns the surface of a
  body of land in Refugio County, Texas, that is estimated to contain
  approximately 3,800 acres and that is commonly known as "Negley
  Ranch," "Swan Lake Ranch," "Duncan Point," and other names;
               (2)  all the surface of this property was patented by
  the State of Texas into private ownership through 13 patents or
  awards, dating from 1861 through 1956, that together state a
  collective patented area in Refugio County of 3,827.37 acres and
  included inland lake waters;
               (3)  in five of these patents, dated 1946 or 1952, the
  state reserved as a free royalty a one-sixteenth royalty on all oil
  and gas production and a one-eighth royalty on sulphur and other
  minerals, and in three of these patents, dated 1956, the state
  reserved as a free royalty one-eighth of all oil, gas, sulphur, and
  other minerals;
               (4)  since the issuance of the patents, various
  landowners, mineral owners, and others have relied in good faith on
  these patents, including the free royalty mineral reservations
  stated therein, and with the exception of those free royalty
  mineral reservations, all the minerals within the boundaries
  described by each of the 13 patents are today owned by Donner
  Properties, except for a portion owned by ConocoPhillips;
               (5)  the potential value of the property for future
  mineral development is currently believed to be minimal;
               (6)  the property, which is mostly undeveloped, offers
  a wildlife habitat having importance publicly recognized by the
  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior,
  and the principal use of the property is recreation and enjoyment of
  its natural beauty;
               (7)  of the property conveyed by the 13 patents,
  approximately 70 percent was conveyed by means of, and is owned
  under, patents whose boundaries are defined entirely or almost
  entirely by metes and bounds calls of course and distance and not by
  calls to any shore or waters or other natural monument;
               (8)  of the property conveyed by the 13 patents,
  approximately 30 percent was conveyed by means of, and is owned
  under, patents that have at least one boundary defined by a call to
  the shore of Hynes Bay, San Antonio Bay, or Guadalupe Bayou;
               (9)  under timeless rules of coastal geography law, the
  shores of Hynes Bay, San Antonio Bay, and Guadalupe Bayou are
  continuous, can be easily located and surveyed, and for survey and
  boundary purposes exist today in substantially the same locations,
  without gaps, as their locations reflected by the maps, surveys,
  and property descriptions filed in the General Land Office in
  connection with the patents;
               (10)  under Section 18.033, Civil Practice and Remedies
  Code, the maps, surveys, and property descriptions filed in the
  General Land Office in connection with each of the 13 patents are
  presumed to accurately depict the boundaries between the patents
  and the adjacent state-owned lands submerged beneath Hynes Bay, San
  Antonio Bay, and Guadalupe Bayou;
               (11)  all waters situated within the footprint of the
  13 patents, being neither navigable in fact nor navigable in law,
  are not in any part public water but are private water in which the
  public has no right to boat or fish, and the right of the owners to
  exclude the public from those waters is not subject to any public
  easement or piscatory rights but is absolute and unqualified;
               (12)  for decades, private owners have paid property
  taxes on all of the property conveyed by the 13 patents, including
  the land covered by water;
               (13)  the General Land Office has never assigned state
  lease tract numbers to any property located within the recorded
  boundaries of any of the 13 patents but has created state lease
  tracts adjacent to the property whose boundaries follow, adjoin,
  respect, and agree with the private boundaries as shown on the maps,
  surveys, and property descriptions filed in the General Land Office
  in connection with the 13 patents, and the electronic "Interactive
  Land/Lease Mapping System" published and maintained on the Internet
  by the General Land Office also shows boundaries that agree with the
  boundaries established by the patents;
               (14)  over time, land within the 13 patents has eroded
  or accreted in various places, and as a result, some private waters
  over the thirteen patents are not physically separated by land from
  public waters of adjacent bays;
               (15)  members of the public, especially during hunting
  season, have invaded and disturbed the owners' peaceful enjoyment
  of their property, creating an unreasonable risk of breaches of the
  peace, potential premises liability issues, and other problems
  inconsistent with this state's system of property rights;
               (16)  the public confusion and resulting risk of injury
  and harm can be dispelled, and the peace restored, only by a court
  decree fixing and determining with certainty the location of the
  boundary that separates the land and private water owned by the
  owners under the 13 patents from the state-owned submerged land and
  public water of Hynes Bay, San Antonio Bay, and Guadalupe Bayou that
  surround the property on three sides, and also determining the
  rights of the owners to exclude the public from the land and the
  water within the bounds of the 13 patents;
               (17)  Grandfather's Blind, Ltd., has attempted to
  affirm the boundaries originally established by the 13 patents
  issued by the General Land Office and has been told by the General
  Land Office that it no longer owns the land covered by water;
               (18)  the owners do not seek recovery of monetary
  damages from the state, but seek only to obtain the determination of
  their boundary and determination of their rights through a court
  order that:
                     (A)  fixes and determines the boundary that
  separates the land privately owned by the owners under the 13
  patents from the adjacent land owned by the state;
                     (B)  decrees that the owners have the absolute and
  exclusive right to use and enjoy all of the land within the outer
  perimeter of the 13 patents and to exclude the public therefrom,
  including land that is covered by water;
                     (C)  decrees that with the exception of those
  certain mineral interests reserved to the state as a free royalty
  under the express terms of some of the patents, all of the minerals
  within the outer perimeter of the boundary established by those
  patents, including minerals lying under lands covered by water, are
  owned according to the terms of the conveyances made under the
  patents; and
                     (D)  decrees that the owners have the absolute and
  exclusive right to use and enjoy all of the water within the outer
  perimeter of the 13 patents, which is private water that is not
  navigable and to exclude the public from boating on, fishing in, or
  otherwise using that water; now, therefore, be it
         RESOLVED by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That
  Grandfather's Blind, Ltd., and Donner Properties are granted
  permission to sue the State of Texas, the General Land Office, and
  the School Land Board subject to Chapter 107, Civil Practice and
  Remedies Code; and, be it further
         RESOLVED, That the suit authorized by this resolution may be
  brought in Refugio or Travis County; and, be it further
         RESOLVED, That the relief awarded in the suit authorized by
  this resolution is limited to the relief authorized under Chapter
  37, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, or Chapter 22, Property Code,
  or both; and, be it further
         RESOLVED, That the commissioner of the General Land Office,
  and the chairman of the School Land Board, both offices currently
  being held by the same person, be served process as provided by
  Section 107.002(a)(3), Civil Practice and Remedies Code.