|
|
|
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
|
|
WHEREAS, The Employee Free Choice Act, a legislative priority |
|
of labor organizations, would bring drastic change to the American |
|
workplace, distorting the employer-employee relationship in |
|
fundamental ways; and |
|
WHEREAS, Currently, most workers join unions through secret |
|
ballot elections; under the National Labor Relations Act, a union |
|
seeking to represent employees must show the National Labor |
|
Relations Board that there is sufficient interest at a workplace, |
|
typically by collecting employee signatures or signed |
|
authorization cards from 50 to 75 percent of the workforce; the NLRB |
|
holds a secret ballot election after a period in which both the |
|
union and the employer may state their cases; rules forbid |
|
employers to threaten, intimidate, or make promises to employees to |
|
encourage votes against the union, although unions do not have |
|
similar constraints; and |
|
WHEREAS, The EFCA would force employers to recognize a union |
|
without an election; the union would merely need to submit |
|
authorization cards from more than 50 percent of employees to the |
|
NLRB in order to gain certification; these cards would be signed |
|
publicly, exposing reluctant workers to pressure tactics and |
|
harassment from organizers, who are paid to recruit dues-paying |
|
members, while employers would be prevented from informing workers |
|
of negative aspects of unionization; and |
|
WHEREAS, Moreover, the EFCA would have a profound negative |
|
impact on the bargaining process; under the act, if a company and a |
|
newly certified union failed to reach agreement on an initial |
|
contract after 90 days, they would have only an additional 30 days |
|
to reach an agreement with the assistance of the Federal Mediation |
|
and Conciliation Service; after 120 days of unsuccessful |
|
negotiation, the issue would be submitted to binding arbitration |
|
and a government arbitrator would write a contract effective for |
|
the next two years; and |
|
WHEREAS, The arbitrator would have little experience with the |
|
company or knowledge of its business practices, yet would dictate |
|
all wages and working conditions; neither the company nor its |
|
employees would be able to appeal the ruling of an arbitrator, who |
|
would not be held accountable for mistakes; an ill-advised ruling |
|
could compromise a company's financial health, possibly sending it |
|
into bankruptcy, or deprive workers of a wage increase they might |
|
have gained through collective bargaining; binding arbitration |
|
decisions can also take an inordinate amount of time, and |
|
uncertainty over future business costs would likely cause a company |
|
to reduce investment until the contract is handed down; |
|
furthermore, the bureaucratic approach of binding arbitration |
|
stifles firms with innovative business models; and |
|
WHEREAS, The Employee Free Choice Act is surely a misnomer; |
|
arguably the most far-reaching change in labor law in 70 years, it |
|
strips employees of their privacy and their rights, exposing them |
|
to intimidation and constraining their ability to bargain with |
|
their employers; at the same time, it would have dire economic |
|
consequences, resulting in slower growth and fewer jobs; now, |
|
therefore, be it |
|
RESOLVED, That the 81st Legislature of the State of Texas |
|
hereby respectfully urge the Congress of the United States to |
|
oppose any efforts to adopt the Employee Free Choice Act or any |
|
similar legislation; and, be it further |
|
RESOLVED, That the Texas secretary of state forward official |
|
copies of this resolution to the president of the United States, to |
|
the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the |
|
senate of the United States Congress, and to all the members of the |
|
Texas delegation to the congress with the request that this |
|
resolution be officially entered in the Congressional Record as a |
|
memorial to the Congress of the United States of America. |