LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 29, 2009

TO:
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB3112 by Hartnett (Relating to determining the need for guardianship.), As Introduced



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3112, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,282,822) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2010 ($2,152,809)
2011 ($2,130,013)
2012 ($2,130,013)
2013 ($2,130,013)
2014 ($2,130,013)




Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from
General Revenue Fund
1
2010 ($2,152,809)
2011 ($2,130,013)
2012 ($2,130,013)
2013 ($2,130,013)
2014 ($2,130,013)



Fiscal Year Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009
2010 25.0
2011 25.0
2012 25.0
2013 25.0
2014 25.0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend Human Resources Code Section 161.101(b) and (c) and add section (d) and amend Human Resources Code Section 48.209 by adding Section (b). The bill would require the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) to use, in conducting an assessment of an elderly or disabled person to determine whether a guardianship is appropriate, a certificate of medical examination (CME) required to be provided by the Department of Family and Protective Services – Adult Protective Services (DFPS-APS) that complies with Probate Code Section 687(a). Provisions of the bill would require DADS to determine if a guardianship is appropriate within 30 days or if there are less restrictive alternatives to guardianship. If guardianship would be appropriate, DADS would be required to file the application within the same 30 day period.

Methodology

DADS indicated that under current statute, the assessment process averages about 30 days before a determination whether or not to file for guardianship is made. DADS assumed, pursuant to provisions of the bill, that the assessment and the filing of the legal documents for appointment of a guardian (if appropriate) would need to occur within the 30-day period beginning on the day DFPS-APS referral is made to DADS. DADS said that requirement would have the effect of compressing a 60- to 90-day process into 30 days. DADS estimated that to process the current caseload assessments in a 30-day period, 13 additional Guardianship Specialists would be needed in the regions. If guardianship is appropriate, the legal documents requesting the appointment would need to be prepared, reviewed and filed within the 30-day period. DADS estimated that it would require six additional attorneys, five additional legal assistants in the regions and one program specialist for the compressed schedule.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
530 Family and Protective Services, Department of, 539 Aging and Disability Services, Department of
LBB Staff:
JOB, CL, ML, LR