TO: | Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB3633 by Geren (Relating to the purchase by state agencies of certain lamps.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2010 | ($2,209,682) |
2011 | ($2,209,682) |
2012 | ($2,209,682) |
2013 | ($2,209,682) |
2014 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
Probable Savings/(Cost) from State Parks Acct 64 |
---|---|---|
2010 | ($2,209,682) | ($263,330) |
2011 | ($2,209,682) | ($263,330) |
2012 | ($2,209,682) | ($263,330) |
2013 | ($2,209,682) | ($263,330) |
2014 | $0 | ($263,330) |
The bill would amend Subchapter D, Chapter 2158 of the Government Code, relating to the purchase of electrical items, by adding Section 2158.182. The bill would require that state agencies consider installing and/or replacing outdoor lighting with lamps that meet certain specifications. These specifications are: a minimum of 60 lumens per watt and a minimum life expectancy of 50,000 hours. The provisions of the bill would apply only to the installation of the new lamps or to the repair, renovation, or retrofit of lamps no longer functioning. The bill would also require the Energy Systems Laboratory at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station to conduct a study of outdoor lighting fixtures used by state agencies.
The bill would take effect September 1, 2009.
This analysis assumes that state agencies would install and replace outdoor lighting with lamps that meet the specifications in the bill.
The Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) reports that, annually, it replaces 33 percent of its garage lighting and 25 percent of its pole and miscellaneous site lighting in its existing inventory. This equates to approximately 1,081 garage lights and 382 pole and miscellaneous lights replaced by the agency every year with this replacement schedule. It is assumed that this replacement schedule would remain in effect, and that the replacement lamps would be Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), which would meet the required specifications. With the new specifications, TFC reports that the average cost of replacing a garage light would be approximately $350, and the average cost of replacing pole and miscellaneous lights would be approximately $650. The agency cites the reason for the relatively high per unit cost as that it would have to replace not only the lamp, but also the fixture and ballast due to the new technology not being compatible with the current units. By 2014, the retrofitting of all lights in the agency's inventory is projected to be complete.
The estimated cost to the
The State Preservation Board (SPB), which maintains outdoor lighting for the State Capitol, Capitol Grounds, and the Capitol Visitors' Parking Garage, reports that the provisions of the bill would result in costs of $3,166,064 for the 2010-11 biennium. At a replacement rate of approximately 30 percent annually, the SPB estimates the incremental cost of replacing its current 509 fixtures with LED replacement fixtures as $1,583,032 per year. The agency reports 4 distinct types of fixtures that are currently used: 1000-watt fixtures (104 total) at an incremental cost of $32,533 each, 175-watt metal halides (110 total) at an incremental cost of $5,268 each, 27-watt compact fluorescent (85 total) at an incremental cost of $996 each, and tree light fixtures (210 total) at an incremental cost of $5,268 each. The agency cites the fact that the new lighting technology would also require replacing the unique fixtures in addition to the lamps, as reasons for the relatively high per unit cost of each replacement. It is assumed that all of the fixtures will be replaced by fiscal year 2014.
The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) indicates the provisions of the bill would result in increased costs for the regular replacement of light fixtures on existing roadways and the installation of new light fixtures for new construction projects. Based on the analysis of TxDOT, it is assumed any costs or duties associated with implementing the provisions of the bill would be accommodated through the reallocation of existing funding for highway construction and maintenance.
Both the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and the Texas Historical Commission reported that the bill's provisions would not have significant fiscal implications to the agencies.
It is assumed that the Texas Engineering Experiment Station could implement the provisions of the bill and conduct a study of outdoor lighting fixtures used by state agencies within existing resources.
Source Agencies: | 303 Facilities Commission, 712 Texas Engineering Experiment Station, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department, 809 Preservation Board, 601 Department of Transportation, 696 Department of Criminal Justice, 808 Historical Commission
|
LBB Staff: | JOB, KJG, RT, SK, MS, DEH
|