TO: | Honorable Florence Shapiro, Chair, Senate Committee on Education |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB4091 by Farrar (Relating to bilingual education, English as a second language, and other special language programs and to an intensive reading improvement program for public school students of limited English proficiency.), As Engrossed |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2010 | ($6,840,211) |
2011 | ($6,834,390) |
2012 | ($6,810,390) |
2013 | ($7,024,763) |
2014 | ($7,000,763) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
Probable Savings/(Cost) from Foundation School Fund 193 |
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009 |
---|---|---|---|
2010 | ($1,016,022) | ($5,824,189) | 10.0 |
2011 | ($1,110,201) | ($5,724,189) | 13.0 |
2012 | ($1,086,201) | ($5,724,189) | 13.0 |
2013 | ($1,300,574) | ($5,724,189) | 15.5 |
2014 | ($1,276,574) | ($5,724,189) | 15.5 |
The bill would require the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to disaggregate academic excellence indicators for bilingual and English as a Second Language (special language programs) at the school district, campus, and open-enrollment charter school level and would create additional indicators. New indicators include comparative data regarding grade-level retention rates of students of limited English proficiency (LEP students) and non-LEP students, comparative data regarding the performance on state assessments of LEP and non-LEP students, and comparative data regarding the dropout rate between LEP and non-LEP students.
The bill would require that lead monitors of bilingual and special language programs be certified for bilingual education, English as a Second Language, or other special language programs. Emergency endorsements would not qualify as certification for these purposes.
TEA would be required to notify school districts or charter schools of a campus that is non-compliant with respect to bilingual or special language programs in writing within 30 days after an intervention begins. The bill specifies areas that school districts and charter schools would be required to review in response to notification of intervention.
The bill would require TEA to review annual improvement in bilingual or special language programs in relation to annual improvement goals set by the school district or charter school.
The bill would permit school districts to offer an intensive reading improvement program to students with limited English proficiency (LEP students) that includes a research-based curriculum, assessments of growth in vocabulary and reading comprehension that are approved by the Texas Education Agency (TEA), professional development for teachers, and teacher training materials and resources. School districts would be required to offer the program before students enter grade 7, and instruction would be required to begin within six weeks of receipt of a Notice of Grant Award (NOGA).
The bill would require school districts that are required to offer bilingual or special language programs to submit certain additional data to TEA through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). Required data would include whether or not a student has been classified as a LEP student while enrolled in Texas public schools, the school year in which the student entered grade 9, and the student's status as a continuing student, a graduate, a recipient of a high-school equivalency certificate, or a dropout.
School districts and open-enrollment charter schools might incur additional costs related to interventions if programs were found to be ineffective or related to corrective actions if the districts or schools failed to meet one or more annual improvement goals.
School districts would be permitted to offer an intensive reading improvement program to LEP students. The bill provides that funding would be available from a set aside the Compensatory Education Allotment. Subsequent to enactment of House Bill 1, 79th Legislature, 3rd Called Session, reductions to district entitlements under the Foundation School Program resulting from increases to set asides are offset by increases to school district hold harmless amounts.
Source Agencies: | 701 Central Education Agency
|
LBB Staff: | JOB, JSp, JGM, JSc
|