LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 14, 2009

TO:
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB785 by Nelson (Relating to the employee misconduct registry and employee certification posting requirements for certain facilities.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB785, Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($2,464,580) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2010 ($1,762,485)
2011 ($702,095)
2012 ($703,139)
2013 ($704,219)
2014 ($705,335)




Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from
General Revenue Fund
1
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009
2010 ($1,762,485) 9.0
2011 ($702,095) 9.0
2012 ($703,139) 9.0
2013 ($704,219) 9.0
2014 ($705,335) 9.0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would implement recommendations in the Legislative Budget Board's Government Effectiveness and Efficiency Report to the Eighty-first Legislature entitled “Improve Screening of Long Term Care Workers.”

 

The bill would require the following facilities to search the Employee Misconduct Registry (EMR) and the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) annually to ensure no employee has a finding of abuse, neglect, or exploitation (A/N/E): nursing homes and related institutions; assisted living facilities; home and community support service agencies; adult day care facilities; adult foster care providers; local mental health and mental retardation authorities; home health, hospice, or personal assistance services provided only to persons enrolled in a program funded wholly or partly and monitored by Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) or Department of State Health Services (DSHS) respectively or its designated local authority; intermediate care facilities for mental retardation; and mental health facilities operated or contracted with DSHS. This search is in addition to the currently required initial verification of employability. Facilities would be required to maintain a copy of the EMR/NAR search results in each employee’s personnel file.

 

The bill would require that if a finding of A/N/E is overturned and removed in the NAR and it is the basis for an entry in the EMR, then the entry in the EMR would also be removed.

 

The bill would add the following providers for inclusion on the EMR: state hospitals, state schools, community mental health and mental retardation centers, and mental retardation authority-operated facilities. DFPS would conduct the EMR investigations, hearings, and notifications of employees for these providers. The term commissioner is also defined as the commissioner of the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).


Methodology

According to DADS, the EMR database is 10 years old and cannot be readily updated or modified. Due to the addition of new employee groups, upgrading the EMR hardware and software would be necessary at an assumed cost of $1.0 million in General Revenue Funds. Improving the EMR to provide additional functionality would allow DADS to provide capabilities such as different search screens for the public and internal use, and the ability to generate different types of reports based on varying search criteria.

 

The bill’s requirements would result in 9 new Full-time Equivalents (FTEs) at the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) at an annual salary and benefits cost of $575,095 of General Revenue Funds. DFPS would be responsible for investigating abuse, neglect, exploitation (A/N/E) incidents with providers to be added to the EMR. DFPS would also be responsible for notifying the employee of the investigation findings and conducting any administrative hearings associated with a confirmed finding of A/N/E. As a result, DFPS would have an increase in the number of

administrative hearings needed due to adding the additional employee groups to the EMR. According to DFPS, an additional 209 hearings (184 for state employees and 25 for other providers) would be conducted. Six attorneys and one administrative assistant would be needed to process these EMR cases. Each attorney would handle 35 cases per year.

 

DFPS estimates that an additional 559 referrals (444 state employees and 115 other providers) would be made to the EMR. As a result, 2 program specialists would also be needed according to the agency. The program specialists would handle the processing and tracking of EMR referrals for all the new employee groups that would be added to the EMR.

 

Other overhead costs including initial start-up costs such as furniture, telephone, and computers, along with supplies, travel, training, postage, telephone, and utility/square footage are estimated to be $187,390 of General Revenue Funds in fiscal year 2010, decreasing to $127,000 of General Revenue Funds in fiscal year 2011 and beyond.


Technology

The cost in the table above includes a one-time cost for DADS for fiscal year 2010 for updating the hardware (dedicated server) and software of the EMR is estimated to be $1.0 million of General Revenue Funds. Database conversion, making it web-accessible, and additional storage space to accommodate new employee groups is included in the cost.

 

The remainder of the technology cost includes the rental cost, programming, software, service, and technical support of computers and Internet access for DFPS personnel. These costs are estimated to be $16,392 for fiscal year 2010 and $12,855 for fiscal year 2011.


Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
529 Health and Human Services Commission, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of, 537 State Health Services, Department of, 539 Aging and Disability Services, Department of
LBB Staff:
JOB, CL, JI, AFe