TO: | Honorable Robert Duncan, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs |
FROM: | John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | SB1025 by Ogden (Relating to the votes required for a candidate to be elected to office.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2010 | ($500,000) |
2011 | $0 |
2012 | ($500,000) |
2013 | $0 |
2014 | ($500,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
---|---|
2010 | ($500,000) |
2011 | $0 |
2012 | ($500,000) |
2013 | $0 |
2014 | ($500,000) |
The bill would amend the Election Code to change the calculation for determining what constitutes the winner of an election or a tie vote for public offices other than federal office.
Provisions of the bill would apply only to an election held on or after September 1, 2009. The bill would take effect the same date.
According to the Secretary of State (SOS), it is difficult to estimate the fiscal impact since the number of candidates in a race and the competiveness of an election are difficult to predict. However, based on an analysis of the 2008 primary results for state and district office, SOS identified two races in the Democratic primary (state representative district 27 and district attorney, 258th district) and one race in the Republican runoff (district judge, 17th district) that would have required second elections pursuant to provisions of the bill. In contrast, several of the officials that won statewide office in November 2008, would not have been elected and would have been forced to participate in a second election.
Based on the 2008 election results, SOS estimates a 3 percent to 5 percent increase in the cost of conducting elections, which would be an additional $500,000 per election.
Source Agencies: | 307 Secretary of State
|
LBB Staff: | JOB, KJG, MS, DB
|