LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 28, 2009

TO:
Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Business & Industry
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1569 by Eltife (Relating to unemployment compensation modernization.), As Engrossed



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1569, As Engrossed: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2010 $0
2011 $0
2012 $0
2013 $0
2014 $0




Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) from
Wrkforce Commission Fed
5026
Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009
2010 ($1,300,010) 15.0
2011 ($1,026,417) 13.0
2012 ($1,022,345) 13.0
2013 ($1,023,830) 13.0
2014 ($1,025,383) 13.0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill amends the Labor Code relating to unemployment compensation modernization.  The bill amends the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act (TUCA) by adding an alternate base period; allowing individuals to seek only part-time work; removing the six-to-25 week disqualification period for an individual who leaves work because of a spouse’s employment-related relocation, and the commute is impracticable; expanding circumstances and allowed documentation for individuals who leave work due to family violence or stalking; and expanding the circumstances under which an individual may voluntarily leave work to care for an ill or disabled immediate family member.

The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) has been notified by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) that Section 11 of this bill would make the state ineligible to receive UI modernization incentive funds.  Section 11 of the bill states that this Act takes effect only if federal funds are provided to the State of Texas under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in an amount not less than $555 million for unemployment insurance modernization.  According to the analysis provided by TWC and information from DOL, in order for the funding to be approved, the state law requirement must have an effective date that is within the 12 month period from the date of the application.  For the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that Section 11 would be removed to allow the state to be eligible for the additional federal funding. 

In addition to the amounts reflected in the table above, an analysis made by TWC assumes that implementing the provisions of the bill would result in the following fiscal impacts to the Unemployment Trust Fund:

Estimated costs for the Alternate Base Period section would include $43,767,078 in FY 2010, $43,412,611 in FY 2011, $40,937,516 in FY 2012, $39,711,616 in FY 2013, and $39,388,752 in FY 2014, totaling $207,217,573 for the five-year period, in order to pay the unemployment compensation benefits authorized by this bill.  Included in the recently-enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Title II, Section 2003, are amounts appropriated for Special Transfers for Unemployment Compensation Modernization. These amounts include special transfers for FY 2009-11 consisting of incentive payments to be transferred by the Secretary of Labor to state accounts upon certification of various state unemployment compensation law enactments. For such alternative base period legislation as this, it is estimated that Texas would receive an incentive transfer totaling $185,223,781 for the Unemployment Trust Fund.

Estimated costs for the Unemployment Compensation for Part-Time section relating to part-time workers would include $28,036,912 in FY 2010, $28,187,947 in FY 2011, $27,272,474 in FY 2012, $26,876,172 in FY 2013, and $27,006,744 in FY2014, totaling $137,380,248 for the five-year period.

Estimated costs for the Compelling Family Reasons section would include $5,044,090 in FY 2010, $5,058,189 in FY2011, $4,914,150 in FY2012, $4,868,677 in FY2013, and $4,887,307 in FY2014, totaling $24,727,413 during the five-year period.

According to the TWC and the information provided by DOL, the removal of Section 11 would allow the state to be eligible for $185 million in federal funding for the Alternative Base Period.  Deleting this provision would also make the state elgible for the additional $371 million for the part-time workers and the compelling family reasons.

In addition to those estimated impacts noted above, implementation of the provisions under  SECTION 7 of the bill would result in an estimated potential savings to the Unemployment Trust Fund of $17,394,941 in FY 2010, $17,275,432 in FY 2011, $16,305,600 in FY 2012, $15,873,312 in FY 2013, and $15,746,203 in FY 2014, totaling $82,595,488 for  the five-year period.  Under current law, individuals who are discharged for misconduct or leave voluntarily without good cause can avoid a disqualification by accepting, then being laid off from, a brief temporary job. According to the analysis by TWC, this change will reduce the number of individuals receiving benefits.  If this change is enacted, TWC would have to modify its claims taking processes to determine if the last employer named by the claimant meets the new definitions outlined in statute.

As identified in DOL Workforce Security Research Publication 98-4, it is estimated that employers would experience costs associated with implementing an unemployment compensation alternative base period, by spending an average of 39 minutes in processing a wage request (i.e., in response to mailed requests for lag quarter wages), with an average processing cost by employers of $9.76 per request. Based on information provided from DOL,  estimated costs for employers associated with enactment of this legislation would total $394,587 in FY 2010 and an average of $321,509 each year during FY 2011-14.


Methodology

According to the analysis provided by TWC, under the Alternative Base Period section, there would be an impact to Federal Funds to pay for administrative costs (consisting largely of seven Customer Service Representatives, four Hearings Officers and two Clerks) to handle increased workload for a total of $1,119,636 in FY 2010, $1,016,452 in FY 2011, $1,012,380 in FY 2012, $1,013,865 in FY 2013, and $1,015,418 in FY 2014.


Technology

For the Alternate Base Period, TWC estimates there would be a one-time technology cost of $180,374 in FY 2010 and ongoing costs of $9,965 per year in 2011-14 for TWC to update the UI Benefits System.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.


Source Agencies:
320 Texas Workforce Commission
LBB Staff:
JOB, JRO, MW, NV