LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
March 30, 2009

TO:
Honorable Royce West, Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB1860 by Jackson, Mike (Relating to animal shelter standards; providing a civil penalty.), As Introduced

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code to authorize a county to enforce standards established for operating an animal shelter. The bill would establish a civil penalty of not less than $100 nor more than $500 for each violation and for each day of a continuing violation of the standards for operating an animal shelter.

In addition, a county, a municipality, or the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) could institute a civil suit in district court to seek injunctive relief to restrain a person from continuing to commit a violation, to assess and recover the civil penalty, or both actions. If DSHS, a county, or a municipality prevails in court, they would be entitled to recover reasonable costs of investigating the violation, as well as reasonable attorney's fee and court costs.

The proposed change in law would apply only to conduct that occurs on or after the effective date of the bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009.

Revenue gain from imposing a civil penalty would depend on the number of violations, the number of days the violation continues, and the judge's discretion in imposing the penalty. According the DSHS, costs associated with implementing provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.


Local Government Impact

As indicated above, revenue gain would depend on the number of violations, the number of days the violation continues, and the judge's discretion in imposing a penalty. It is assumed that a local government could absorb any associated enforcement costs within existing resources.

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.



Source Agencies:
537 State Health Services, Department of
LBB Staff:
JOB, DB