LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 14, 2009

TO:
Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Chair, Senate Committee on Jurisprudence
 
FROM:
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
SB2214 by Ellis (Relating to a fee imposed on foreclosure filings to fund civil legal services to indigent Texans.), As Introduced



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB2214, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2010 $0
2011 $0
2012 $0
2013 $0
2014 $0




Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from
Basic Civil Legal Services Account , Judicial Fund
573
2010 $15,744,000
2011 $17,948,000
2012 $17,051,000
2013 $16,198,000
2014 $15,388,000

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend Chapter 118 of the Local Government Code, regarding fees charged by county officers.

The bill would require a county clerk to collect a fee of $150 for the filing of the first page of a foreclosure notice filed pursuant to Section 51.002(b)(2) of the Property Code. The county treasurer would remit fee collections to the Comptroller of Public Accounts for deposit to the Basic Civil Legal Services Fund of the Supreme Court.

The bill would take effect immediately if it receives the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009.


Methodology

The comptroller provided information based on calendar year 2008 foreclosure filings, which was obtained through a survey of certain county clerks' offices, and those results were extrapolated to an estimated statewide total. Estimated filings were adjusted to reflect the expectation of the current foreclosure pattern continuing into fiscal 2010, then receding, and adjusted for a September 1, 2009 effective date and projected through fiscal 2014.

Local Government Impact

There would be no revenue gain to the counties because the full $150 collected would be submitted to the Comptroller of Public Accounts. There would be administrative costs for collecting the extra fee, maintaining separate records, and making quarterly submissions.

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.



Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff:
JOB, MN, DB