BILL ANALYSIS |
H.B. 1830 |
By: Naishtat |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Unamended) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There is concern that the law does not adequately address the use of electronic communications by statutory probate court associate judges to communicate with the parties to a proceeding. H.B. 1830 seeks to address this concern by enabling judges to communicate officially through electronic mail.
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
ANALYSIS
H.B. 1830 amends the Government Code, in provisions relating to an associate judge's report to a referring court, to include electronic mail as an authorized method of providing notice of the substance of an associate judge's report to parties participating in a hearing. The bill establishes that there is a rebuttable presumption that notice is received on the date stated on a printout evidencing submission of an electronic mail message, if notice was provided by electronic mail, among other methods.
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2011.
|