System updates will be applied on February 19, 2026 at 6:00 PM. These updates will include changes to the user interface. Work is expected to take approximately 30 minutes to complete, during which the site will be unavailable.

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

S.B. 539

By: Carona

Business & Industry

Committee Report (Unamended)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 

Currently, a judge has discretion regarding the award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in a successful suit to foreclose on a mechanic's or materialman's lien or to enforce a claim against a construction-related bond or to declare a lien or claim to be invalid or unenforceable.  Some recent court cases have held that a mechanic's or materialman's lien holder who forecloses on a lien or bond is not entitled to court costs or reasonable attorney's fees.

 

S.B. 539 seeks to ensure that a successful party recovers reasonable costs after having to go through the expense of bringing an action by requiring a judge to award costs and reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in a suit to foreclose on a mechanic's or materialman's lien or a claim against a construction-related bond.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS

 

S.B. 539 amends the Property Code to require, rather than authorize, a court to award costs and reasonable attorney's fees as are equitable and just in any proceeding to foreclose a lien or to enforce a claim against a bond, or to declare that any lien or claim is invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part, under the law governing mechanic's, contractor's, or materialman's liens.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE

 

September 1, 2011.