82R3749 SJM-D
 
  By: Guillen H.B. No. 446
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to discovery in a criminal case and the consequences of a
  failure to disclose certain discoverable evidence in a timely
  manner.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Article 39.14, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (a-1),
  (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
         (a)  Not later than the 30th day after the date an
  information or indictment is filed in a criminal action [Upon
  motion of the defendant showing good cause therefor and upon notice
  to the other parties], except as provided by Article 39.15, the
  court in which the [an] action is pending shall order the State
  [before or during trial of a criminal action therein pending or on
  trial] to produce and permit defense counsel to inspect [the
  inspection] and, on the condition that defense counsel is
  prohibited from further reproduction by or dissemination to a
  person other than an agent of the attorney, to copy [copying] or
  photograph [photographing by or on behalf of the defendant of] any
  designated documents, papers, reports by law enforcement
  personnel, written or electronically recorded statements of
  witnesses, written or electronically recorded statements
  [statement] of the defendant, ([except written statements of
  witnesses and] except the work product of counsel in the case and
  their investigators and their notes or report), books, accounts,
  letters, photographs, objects or tangible things not privileged,
  which constitute or contain evidence material to any matter
  involved in the action and which are in the possession, custody or
  control of the State or any of its agencies. The order shall
  specify the time, place and manner of making the inspection and
  taking the copies and photographs of any of the aforementioned
  documents or tangible evidence; provided, however, that the rights
  herein granted shall not extend to written communications between
  the State or any of its agents or representatives or employees
  except to the extent that all or part of the communications are
  subject to disclosure under Rule 705, Texas Rules of Evidence.
  Nothing in this Act shall authorize the removal of [such] evidence
  described by this subsection from the possession of the State, and
  defense counsel shall make any inspection [shall be] in the
  presence of a representative of the State.
         (a-1)  Release of information held by a prosecuting attorney
  to defense counsel in pending or reasonably anticipated litigation
  is not a voluntary disclosure under Section 552.007, Government
  Code, and does not bar the State from asserting exceptions to
  required disclosure with respect to information released.
         (c)  The State shall supplement or amend, as necessary and
  within a reasonable period, discovery ordered under this article.
  If after the 10th day before trial begins, or during trial, the
  State discloses evidence in violation of the reasonable period for
  discovery required by this subsection and if the evidence is
  materially favorable to the defendant, the manner in which defense
  counsel uses that evidence at trial may not be considered against
  the defendant in any subsequent review of the case.
         (d)  The prosecuting attorney may redact or otherwise edit
  law enforcement reports or witness statements for good cause. If
  defense counsel intentionally violates a court order relating to
  discovery of a law enforcement report or witness statement, the
  prosecuting attorney may restrict further discovery as necessary
  under the circumstances. If as described by this subsection the
  prosecuting attorney asserts good cause or alleges an intentional
  violation of a court order relating to discovery of a law
  enforcement report or witness statement, the court, on the defense
  counsel's motion, shall hold a hearing to determine whether good
  cause or the alleged violation exists. If the court is unable to
  find good cause or an intentional violation of the court order, the
  court shall order the prosecuting attorney to grant defense counsel
  access to the redacted, edited, or restricted material or access to
  further discovery to the extent otherwise permitted by this
  article. This subsection does not prohibit the discovery of
  evidence materially favorable to the defendant.
         (e)  A district or county attorney may enter into a written
  agreement with a local criminal defense bar association regarding
  the implementation of the discovery procedures described by this
  article.
         SECTION 2.  The changes in law made by Article 39.14, Code of
  Criminal Procedure, as amended by this Act, apply to a criminal
  action for which the information or indictment was filed on or after
  the effective date of this Act. A criminal action for which the
  information or indictment was filed before the effective date of
  this Act is covered by the law in effect on the date the information
  or indictment was filed, and the former law is continued in effect
  for that purpose.
         SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.