|
|
|
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
|
|
WHEREAS, The Texas marine industry was placed at a severe |
|
disadvantage in July 2010, when Florida instituted a cap on sales |
|
and use taxes for boat sales; and |
|
WHEREAS, In Florida, the maximum sales or use tax that may be |
|
levied against a sale of a boat or vessel is now $18,000; once the |
|
sales or use tax is paid, the owner has the right to keep the boat in |
|
Florida as long as desired; the Florida Boat-Sales Use Tax Cap |
|
legislation, also known as the Florida Maritime Full Employment |
|
Act, was included in the larger Jobs for Florida Bill because the |
|
state had been losing boat sales and service business and the |
|
attendant jobs and revenue to other states and countries offering |
|
more favorable sales tax treatment; and |
|
WHEREAS, The Florida sales and use tax cap is expected to |
|
stimulate sales, especially of boats valued at over $300,000, and |
|
to encourage boat buyers and current owners to register, keep, and |
|
use their watercraft in the state; according to one estimate, this |
|
stimulus will allow Florida to gain an estimated $18.7 million in |
|
sales tax revenue while creating more jobs in the marine industry; |
|
and |
|
WHEREAS, Texas is currently the country's second largest boat |
|
sales market, but its sales tax laws discourage the purchase of |
|
vessels over 65 feet, and the new sales and use tax cap in Florida |
|
gives that state an advantage that is likely to cost the Lone Star |
|
State sales, tax revenue, and jobs; and |
|
WHEREAS, To remain competitive in the marine services |
|
industry, Texas must ensure that its tax policies do not encourage |
|
prospective boat buyers to take their business to another state; |
|
now, therefore, be it |
|
RESOLVED, That the 82nd Legislature of the State of Texas |
|
hereby request the lieutenant governor and the speaker of the house |
|
of representatives to create a joint interim committee to study tax |
|
policy as it relates to boat sales and marine services and to |
|
evaluate the competitiveness of the marine services industry in |
|
Texas as compared to Florida; and, be it further |
|
RESOLVED, That the committee's proceedings and operations be |
|
governed by such general rules and policies for joint interim |
|
committees as the 82nd Legislature may adopt. |