|
|
|
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
|
|
WHEREAS, Mike Leach alleges the following. |
|
WHEREAS this case involves a dispute between Texas Tech |
|
University and Leach, its former head football coach, over the |
|
termination of his employment. |
|
WHEREAS Texas Tech University executed a contract of |
|
employment with Leach effective January 1, 2009 (the "Agreement"), |
|
contracting to retain Leach's services as Head Football Coach of |
|
the University's Division 1 football program for a term of five |
|
years. |
|
WHEREAS the Agreement incorporates Texas Tech University's |
|
policies and procedures as terms of the contract, and provides that |
|
Leach is entitled to the benefits of Texas Tech University's |
|
policies and procedures. Among other things, the TTU Operating |
|
Procedures ("OP") provide that an employee aggrieved by an |
|
employment decision of the University may appeal that decision |
|
through a grievance proceeding without fear that the University |
|
will retaliate. |
|
WHEREAS at Coach Leach's election, that proceeding could |
|
take the form of a civil lawsuit: |
|
In the event the employee files substantially the same issues as the |
|
grievance or complaint before or during this procedure with any
|
|
external agency or court, the employee may elect to remove such
|
|
issues of grievance or complaint from further consideration through |
|
this process. |
|
WHEREAS these policies were established under a direct grant |
|
of authority by the Texas Legislature. |
|
WHEREAS the Employment Agreement contains certain provisions |
|
limiting termination by Texas Tech University, including a |
|
termination without cause provision, a termination for cause |
|
provision, and a notice and cure provision. |
|
WHEREAS on December 28, 2009, Leach received a letter |
|
suspending him as head football coach of Texas Tech University. |
|
WHEREAS Leach's attorney sought a temporary restraining |
|
order in the District Court of Lubbock County as allowed by Texas |
|
Tech OP 70.10 to complain of Defendant's actions and failure to |
|
accord Leach due process, and to complain of Texas Tech's breach of |
|
his contract. |
|
WHEREAS on December 30, 2009, representatives of Texas Tech |
|
handed Leach's counsel a letter of termination advising Leach that |
|
he was terminated from his employment for cause effective December |
|
30, 2009. |
|
WHEREAS in firing Leach, Texas Tech University invoked the |
|
"with cause" provision of his contract. As a result, the University |
|
has refused to pay him the compensation, including bonuses to which |
|
Leach was or would have been entitled and certain guaranteed income |
|
it owes under the Agreement. |
|
WHEREAS Texas Tech University, has still yet to pay Leach for |
|
his completed services during the 2009 football season, including a |
|
payment due under the Employment Agreement for $1.6 million as |
|
"Guaranteed Outside Income." |
|
WHEREAS though Leach followed Texas Tech University's |
|
required procedure to address grievances under the Employment |
|
Agreement, he has never been able to fully adjudicate his claims |
|
against Texas Tech University. Leach has been prohibited by Texas |
|
Tech University's protection under sovereign immunity. Leach |
|
alleges that Texas Tech University breached its contract by, among |
|
other things, suspending him without any process or contractual |
|
basis, failing to give Coach Leach notice as required under his |
|
contract and a reasonable opportunity to cure, and allegedly |
|
terminating him for cause when no good cause exists. In addition, |
|
because the procedural safeguards, including an appeal, are a term |
|
and condition of Coach Leach's employment, termination without |
|
permitting such appeal constitutes a breach of contract. |
|
WHEREAS if successful in proving his allegations against |
|
Texas Tech University, Mike Leach is entitled to an award of actual |
|
damages for breach of contract, which may include consequential, |
|
special and incidental damages, and is also entitled to reasonable |
|
attorney fees, interest on past damages, and costs of suit as may be |
|
authorized by law. |
|
WHEREAS the damages that Mike Leach seeks shall not include |
|
tort damages or punitive damages. Nor does Leach seek permission to |
|
sue any individual official of Texas Tech University for any cause |
|
of action. By this resolution, Mike Leach does not seek |
|
authorization or permission to join any other agency, institution |
|
or university of the State of Texas in this or any other lawsuit. |
|
WHEREAS Mike Leach, if successful, shall initially seek to |
|
satisfy the judgment from non-appropriated funding sources |
|
available to the Texas Tech University Athletic Department. Any |
|
attempt to satisfy the judgment from appropriated state funds shall |
|
require separate approval of the State Legislature. |
|
WHEREAS the Seventh Court of Appeals of Texas ruled that |
|
Texas Tech University had not waived its protection from suit under |
|
sovereign immunity and that the Legislature of the State of Texas |
|
was the only proper entity to waive such sovereign immunity. |
|
RESOLVED by the 82nd Legislature of the State of Texas, That |
|
Mike Leach is granted permission to sue Texas Tech University for |
|
breach of contract.; and be it further |
|
RESOLVED, That, Guy Bailey at the Office of the President of |
|
Texas Tech University, as a representative of Texas Tech University |
|
and the Attorney General of the State of Texas be served with |
|
process as provided by Section 107.002 of the Texas Civil Practices |
|
and Remedies Code. |