|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
relating to comprehensive development agreements of the Texas |
|
Department of Transportation that include the financing, design, |
|
and construction of a project. |
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
SECTION 1. Section 223.201(b), Transportation Code, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
(b) In this subchapter, "comprehensive development |
|
agreement" means an agreement that, at a minimum, provides for the |
|
financing, design, and construction[, rehabilitation, expansion,
|
|
or improvement] of a project described in Subsection (a) and may |
|
also provide for the [financing,] acquisition, maintenance, or |
|
operation of a project described in Subsection (a). For purposes of |
|
this subsection, construction of a project includes |
|
rehabilitation, expansion, or improvement of a project. |
|
SECTION 2. Section 223.203, Transportation Code, is amended |
|
by amending Subsections (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (l), and (o) |
|
and adding Subsections (f-2) and (l-1) to read as follows: |
|
(a) If the department enters into a comprehensive |
|
development agreement, the department shall use a competitive |
|
procurement process that provides the best value for the |
|
department. [The department may accept unsolicited proposals for a
|
|
proposed project or solicit proposals in accordance with this
|
|
section.] |
|
(c) If the department decides to issue a request for |
|
qualifications for a proposed project, the [The] department shall |
|
publish a notice advertising a request for competing proposals and |
|
qualifications in the Texas Register that includes the criteria to |
|
be used to evaluate the proposals, the relative weight given to the |
|
criteria, and a deadline by which proposals must be received [if:
|
|
[(1)
the department decides to issue a request for
|
|
qualifications for a proposed project; or
|
|
[(2)
the department authorizes the further evaluation
|
|
of an unsolicited proposal]. |
|
(d) A proposal submitted in response to a request published |
|
under Subsection (c) must contain, at a minimum, information |
|
regarding the private entity's qualifications, experience, |
|
technical competence, and capability to develop the project [the
|
|
information required by Subsections (b)(2) and (3)]. |
|
(e) The department may interview a private entity |
|
[submitting an unsolicited proposal or] responding to a request |
|
under Subsection (c). The department shall evaluate each proposal |
|
based on the criteria described in the request for competing |
|
proposals and qualifications and may qualify or shortlist private |
|
entities to submit detailed proposals under Subsection (f). The |
|
department must qualify or shortlist at least two private entities |
|
to submit detailed proposals for a project under Subsection (f) |
|
unless the department does not receive more than one proposal or one |
|
response to a request under Subsection (c). |
|
(f) After obtaining environmental clearance for a project, |
|
the [The] department shall issue a request for detailed proposals |
|
from all private entities qualified or shortlisted under Subsection |
|
(e) [or prequalified under Subsection (e-1) if the department
|
|
proceeds with the further evaluation of a proposed project]. A |
|
request under this subsection may require additional information |
|
relating to: |
|
(1) the private entity's qualifications and |
|
demonstrated technical competence; |
|
(2) the feasibility of developing the project as |
|
proposed; |
|
(3) engineering or architectural designs; |
|
(4) the private entity's ability to meet schedules; |
|
(5) a financial plan, including costing methodology |
|
and cost proposals; or |
|
(6) any other information the department considers |
|
relevant or necessary. |
|
(f-2) A private entity responding to a request for detailed |
|
proposals issued under Subsection (f) must identify: |
|
(1) companies that will fill key project roles, |
|
including project management, lead design firm, quality control |
|
management, and quality assurance management; and |
|
(2) entities that will serve as key task leaders for |
|
geotechnical, hydraulics and hydrology, structural, environmental, |
|
utility, and right-of-way issues. |
|
(g) In issuing a request for detailed proposals under |
|
Subsection (f), the department may solicit input from entities |
|
qualified under Subsection (e) or any other person. The department |
|
may also solicit input regarding alternative technical concepts |
|
after issuing a request under Subsection (f). A technical solution |
|
presented with a proposal for a project must be complete and |
|
demonstrate full compliance with, and have demonstrated resources |
|
to be able to fulfill, all technical requirements for the project, |
|
including specified quality assurance and quality control program |
|
requirements, safety program requirements, and environmental |
|
program requirements. A proposal that includes a technical |
|
solution that does not meet those requirements is ineligible for |
|
further consideration. |
|
(l) A private entity selected for a comprehensive |
|
development agreement may not make changes to the companies or |
|
entities identified under Subsection (f-2) unless the original |
|
company or entity: |
|
(1) is no longer in business, is unable to fulfill its |
|
legal, financial, or business obligations, or can no longer meet |
|
the terms of the teaming agreement with the private entity; |
|
(2) voluntarily removes itself from the team; |
|
(3) fails to provide a sufficient number of qualified |
|
personnel to fulfill the duties identified during the proposal |
|
stage; or |
|
(4) fails to negotiate in good faith in a timely manner |
|
in accordance with provisions established in the teaming agreement |
|
proposed for the project. |
|
(l-1) If the private entity makes team changes in violation |
|
of Subsection (l), any cost savings resulting from the change |
|
accrue to the state and not to the private entity. [The department
|
|
may require that an unsolicited proposal be accompanied by a
|
|
nonrefundable fee sufficient to cover all or part of its cost to
|
|
review the proposal.] |
|
(o) All teaming agreements and subconsultant agreements |
|
must be executed and provided to the department before the |
|
execution of the comprehensive development agreement. [Subchapter
|
|
A of this chapter and Chapter 2254, Government Code, do not apply to
|
|
a comprehensive development agreement entered into under this
|
|
subchapter.] |
|
SECTION 3. Section 223.204(a), Transportation Code, is |
|
amended to read as follows: |
|
(a) To encourage private entities to submit proposals under |
|
this subchapter, the following information is confidential, is not |
|
subject to disclosure, inspection, or copying under Chapter 552, |
|
Government Code, and is not subject to disclosure, discovery, |
|
subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for its release until a |
|
final contract for a proposed project is entered into: |
|
(1) all or part of a proposal that is submitted by a |
|
private entity for a comprehensive development agreement, except |
|
information described by Section 223.203(d) [provided under
|
|
Sections 223.203(b)(1) and (2)], unless the private entity consents |
|
to the disclosure of the information; |
|
(2) supplemental information or material submitted by |
|
a private entity in connection with a proposal for a comprehensive |
|
development agreement, unless the private entity consents to the |
|
disclosure of the information or material; and |
|
(3) information created or collected by the department |
|
or its agent during consideration of a proposal for a comprehensive |
|
development agreement. |
|
SECTION 4. Sections 223.201(f), (h), and (i) and |
|
223.203(b), (e-1), and (e-2), Transportation Code, are repealed. |
|
SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act to Section |
|
223.203, Transportation Code, apply only to a comprehensive |
|
development agreement entered into on or after the effective date |
|
of this Act. |
|
SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2011. |