LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 82ND LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
May 22, 2011

TO:
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
 
FROM:
John S O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB1646 by Gallego (Relating to representation of certain applicants for writs of habeas corpus in cases involving the death penalty. ), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, which establishes the procedures for an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case.  The bill would provide for either the attorney previously representing the applicant, if the attorney seeks the appointment, the Office of Capital Writs, or other competent counsel to be appointed to represent indigent defendants when the convicting court receives notice that the requirements have been met for a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus.
 
According to the Office of Capital Writs (OCW), there may be additional costs to the new office for increased filings; however, this analysis assumes that costs, if any, could be absorbed within the OCW’s existing resources. Accordingly, to the extent the bill would amend habeas corpus procedures, no significant fiscal implication to the state is anticipated.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2011.

Local Government Impact

The bill could have costs at the local level in cases where the Office of Capital Writs is not appointed, as any costs for other appointed counsel above $25,000 incurred for a death penalty writ would be paid by the county of the convicting court; however costs to a given county would vary depending on the number and cost of such cases in a locality in a given year.


Source Agencies:
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 215 Office of Capital Writs
LBB Staff:
JOB, TB, ESi, KKR